Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017 Jan 12;25(2):98–103. doi: 10.1002/erv.2499

Table 2.

Association of rumination and overvaluation with eating-disorder psychopathology and weight-bias internalization

F p df Adjusted R2 t p β
DV: Global Eating-Disorder Psychopathology
  Step 1 81.67 < .001 1 .26
    Overvaluation of Shape and Weight 9.04 < .001 .51
  Step 2 31.54 < .001 3 .28
    Overvaluation of Shape and Weight    7.71 < .001 .45
    Brooding Rumination 2.78 .006 .19
    Reflective Rumination 0.02 .98 .001
DV: Weight Bias Internalization
  Step 1 102.36 < .001 1 .30
    Overvaluation of Shape and Weight 10.12 < .001 .55
  Step 2 73.00 < .001 3 .48
    Overvaluation of Shape and Weight 8.48 < .001 .42
    Brooding Rumination 8.82 < .001 .50
    Reflective Rumination −2.45 .02 −.13

Note. N = 237. Rumination contributed to variance in global eating-disorder psychopathology beyond the effect of overvaluation of shape and weight, ΔR2 = .03, ΔF = 5.06, p = .007. Global score was calculated without the two items evaluating overvaluation of shape and weight. Rumination contributed to variance in weight bias internalization beyond the effect of overvaluation of shape and weight, ΔR2 = .18, ΔF = 40.93, p < .001.