Table 4.
Net budgetary impact of ferric citrate vs. SOC (US$/year per 100 patients treated) | ||
---|---|---|
Mean (SEM) | p valuea | |
Ratio of missed treatments to hospitalizations | ||
1:1 (base case; 24% reduction in missed treatments) | +213,223 (14,111) | <0.001 |
1.25:1 (30% reduction in missed treatments) | +220,366 (14,340) | <0.001 |
1.5:1 (36% reduction in missed treatments) | +223,281 (14,839) | <0.001 |
Implications of Hb differential on ESA utilization, +0.35 g/dL greater Hb results in: | ||
0% further reduction in ESA (base case) | +213,223 (14,111) | <0.001 |
10% further reduction in ESA | +246,690 (15,871) | <0.001 |
20% further reduction in ESA | +281,758 (19,262) | <0.001 |
30% further reduction in ESA | +316,296 (21,974) | <0.001 |
ESA erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, Hb hemoglobin, SEM standard error of mean, SOC standard of care
a p value for comparison of mean, ferric citrate vs. SOC