Table 2. Efficacy of specific sublingual immunotherapy for AD in previous studies.
Study, year | Total number of patients | Age (range, yr) | Types of allergen used | Duration of treatment (mo) | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cadario et al.4 (2007) | 86 | 3~60 | HDM | 12 | A total of 51 patients (51/86, 59.3%) had a significant improvement defined by a SCORAD reduction of >30%. |
Pajno et al.10 (2007) | 56 | 5~16 | HDM | 18 | A significant improvement of SCORAD from baseline was seen only in the active group. |
Qin et al.3 (2014) | 107 | 18~46 | DF | 12 | A total efficacy rate of 77.78% (35 of 45) was significantly higher than 53.85% (21 of 39) in the control group. |
Di Rienzo et al.9 (2014) | 27 | 5~18 | HDM | 18 | A significant improvement of SCORAD from baseline was seen only in the treated group. |
Present study | 34 | 9~38 | HDM | 12 | A total of 19 patients (19/23, 82.6%) had a significant improvement defined by a EASI score reduction of >30%. |
AD: atopic dermatitis, HDM: house dust mite, SCORAD: SCORing atopic dermatitis, DF: Dermatophagoides farinae, EASI: eczema area and severity index.