Table 2.
Comparison of successfully completed evaluation tasks between ECD-group (n=219) and IHIP-group (n=216) children after 1-year follow-up
| Proportion indicators solved | Scored above mean | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child developmental domain | ECD group, median (IQR) | IHIP group, median (IQR) | ECD group, % (n) | IHIP group, % (n) | RR* (95% CI) |
| FM | 60% (25–75) | 40% (20–60) | 62 (136) | 39 (84) | 1.6 (1.2 to 2.0) |
| RO | 67% (50–75) | 50% (33–67) | 62 (135) | 40 (86) | 1.5 (1.3 to 1.9) |
| BH | 66% (50–100) | 50% (33–67) | 57 (124) | 36 (77) | 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0) |
| PS | 80% (60–100) | 60% (40–83) | 60 (131) | 40 (86) | 1.5 (1.1 to 2.0) |
| CO | 60% (40–80) | 40% (33–60) | 54 (119) | 36 (77) | 1.5 (1.1 to 2.2) |
| ST | 67% (33–75) | 50% (25–67) | 66 (145) | 49 (106) | 1.3 (1.0 to 1.8) |
| GM | 67% (50–83) | 67% (50–83) | 49 (108) | 37 (80) | 1.3 (1.0 to 1.7) |
*Relative risks, estimated by log-binomial generalised estimating equations to account for within-cluster correlation.
BH, basic habits; CO, communication; ECD, early child development; FM, fine motor skills; GM, gross motor skills; IHIP, integrated household intervention package; PS, personal and social development; RO, Relationship between objects; ST, space and time.