Table 1.
MNAR/MAR | Sample size | Group | KNN-TN | KNN-CR | KNN-EU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6%/3% | 25 | Cases | 0.613 (0.072) | 0.619 (0.071) | 0.786 (0.075) |
25 | Controls | 0.436 (0.054) | 0.441 (0.054) | 0.607 (0.047) | |
50 | Cases | 0.597 (0.045) | 0.602 (0.046) | 0.776 (0.048) | |
50 | Controls | 0.415 (0.032) | 0.420 (0.031) | 0.600 (0.028) | |
10%/5% | 25 | Cases | 0.632 (0.099) | 0.637 (0.101) | 0.810 (0.087) |
25 | Controls | 0.416 (0.052) | 0.419 (0.050) | 0.555 (0.044) | |
50 | Cases | 0.607 (0.073) | 0.610 (0.073) | 0.809 (0.069) | |
50 | Controls | 0.409 (0.034) | 0.412 (0.034) | 0.556 (0.029) | |
20%/10% | 25 | Cases | 0.610 (0.108) | 0.612 (0.107) | 0..701 (0.091) |
25 | Controls | 0.381 (0.059) | 0.389 (0.058) | 0.498 (0.048) | |
50 | Cases | 0.586 (0.083) | 0.586 (0.081) | 0.699 (0.071) | |
50 | Controls | 0.370 (0.053) | 0.381 (0.053) | 0.499 (0.041) |
Total missing was considered at 9%, 15% and 30%, and within each missing, MNAR was greater than MAR