Skip to main content
Journal of Medicine and Life logoLink to Journal of Medicine and Life
. 2015;8(Spec Iss 4):125–131.

The impact of training problem-solving skills on self-esteem and behavioral adjustment in teenage girls who have irresponsible parents or no parents

F Shahgholy Ghahfarokhi *, N Moradi **, P Alborzkouh ***, S Radmehr ****, M Zainali *****
PMCID: PMC5319272  PMID: 28316718

Abstract

Proper psychological interventions are of great importance because they help enhancing psychological and public health in adolescents with irresponsible parents or no parents. The current research aimed to examine the impact of training problem-solving experiment on self-esteem and behavioral adjustment in teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents.

Methodology: The approach of the present research was a semi-test via a post-test-pre-test model and a check team. Hence, in Tehran, 40 girls with irresponsible parents or no parents were chosen by using the Convenience modeling, and they were classified into 2 teams: control and experiment. Both groups were pre-tested by using a demography questionnaire, Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale, and a behavioral adjustment questionnaire. Afterwards, both groups were post-tested, and the obtained data were examined by using inferential and descriptive methods through SPSS 21.

Findings: Findings indicated that the training problem-solving skills significantly increased the self-esteem and the behavioral adjustment in teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents (P < 0/ 001).

Conclusion: The conclusion of this research was that training problem-solving methods greatly helps endangered people such as teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents, because these methods are highly efficient especially when they are performed in groups, as they are cheap and accepted by different people.

Keywords: training problem-solving skills, self-esteem, behavioral adjustment, teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents

Introduction

According to WHO (World Health Organization) (2009) [23], adolescence includes ages between 11 and 19 years. People in this age group face significant physical, mental, and social changes. In addition, the pressure of this life stage causes mental disorders [9]; many mental disorders diagnosed at the age of 14 [12].

Today, the various evolutions on social bases, which are due to the movement from traditional lifestyles to industrial lifestyles, have caused gaps in humans’ lives, leading to numerous emotional, psychological, and social damages [9]. Hence, it is no surprise that family bases are weak, requiring houses for children and adolescents with no parents. In the 24-hour houses, there are children and young people of the following sorts: children whose parents were jailed because of drug abuse or drug trafficking, and children who escape their homes because of intra-family problems as well as cultural, economic, and ethical poverty (Ahmadi, 2001) [22]. In this age group, girls are more prone to danger. In a comparison between girls with no parents and normal girls, it was found that there are significant differences regarding depression, brainstorm, social incompatibilities, pessimism, withdrawal, and feeling insecure [9].

Nevertheless, one of the most influential parts protecting humans against anxiety, pressure, and stressful events is self-esteem. Self-esteem is an essential parameter, which can be associated with various factors in life, affecting humans’ observable behaviors [24]. Besides the fact that it includes the fourth need from Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, it supplements to personalities’ confidence and independence [25]. Findings collected from many investigations revealed that a weak self-esteem has outcomes such as distress and grief [26], physical and mental diseases [9], communicational and behavioral difficulties and corrupt actions [26]. In addition, this item requires a special attention especially when it comes to adolescents with irresponsible parents or no parents.

Also, one of the things which might be affected by the lack of social support is individuals’ social adjustment [8]. A social adjustment like physical, emotional, and rational growth is a continuous quantity which gradually becomes perfect [5]. Adolescents can determine their positions in their communications with peers and adults by using social skills to receive social acceptance [17]. In fact, “adjustment” refers to the communication between individuals and their environment (especially social environment); this connection enabling them to respond to their needs and motivations [17]. Therefore, training and interventions, which can enhance adjustment, are highly beneficial.

Training life skills is very useful regarding the forming and improving the individuals’ abilities [13]. One of the most important skills is difficulty solving. As it is known, knowing and using a difficulty-solving experiment is a prerequisite for emotional treatment and performance regulating [8]. Training problem-solving skills is a therapeutic method through which individuals learn how to employ their cognitive experiments to cope via problematic interpersonal status [5]. Because individuals lacking social support might be prone to different psychological problems and to adjustment (Neusk, Hogez & Suiiden, 2003). Also, regarding the fact that one of the characteristics of inadaptable individuals is the lack of problem-solving skills [18], it is very important to improve this skill in people with little social support. As mentioned above, it is critical to do research to identify ways to increase adjustment and self-esteem in teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents.

Methodology

The present research is semi-test with a post-test-pre-test model and an experiment team. The Statistical community of the study consisted of all the teenage girls between the ages of 11 and 18 with irresponsible parents or no parents in 24-hour centers covered by the Welfare Organization of Tehran (autumn, 2016). Because the minimum sample size in experiment researchers is 15 for each group [28], 15 individuals were selected for each group to calculate the sample size. Afterwards, 20 individuals (n = 20) were selected from each cluster to increase statistical competence and to manage probable drops in participants.

The criteria for entering the present study included the following index:

- Having a conscious tendency to participate.

- Having the ability to take part in sessions and do assignments.

- Being a teenage girl from 24-hour welfare centers in Tehran.

- Being between the ages of 11 and 18.

- Having a minimum education (grade 5 of elementary school).

- Being a psychologically and physically healthy girl with irresponsible parents or no parents.

The criteria for exiting the study included the following indexes:

- Having no tendency to participate in sessions, more than three sessions of absence during training.

- Not having the ability to take part in sessions and do assignments.

- Having intense mental disorders, having one medical disorder that affected the result of interventions.

- Receiving other psychological or medical treatments that were not part of the study.

- Being younger than 11 or older than 18.

- Not having enough education or being literate.

The method of performing the research included the visiting of 24-hour Welfare Centers in Tehran that covered girls with irresponsible parents or no parents, and after ensuring the necessary criteria for entering and exiting sessions, 40 girls were randomly selected as a sample, each group having 20 members. Moreover, the girls received explanations about this research, therapy sessions, and research questionnaires; and when they accepted to participate in the sessions, each person was randomly replaced in the control or the experiment group. Before performing the research, the ethical principles of the research were observed as well as the presence of girls who had irresponsible parents or no parents was ensured, the girls receiving explanations about the research and its positive effects. Afterwards, they were asked to announce whether they wanted to participate or not consciously. Next, the experiment group had six sessions (based on six stages of Dezorila and Glad Frid’s pattern) of group training for problem solving; however, the check team did not get any interventions. Finally, both teams were post-tested. The protocol of problem-solving training sessions is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Protocol of problem-solving training sessions based on Dezorila and Glad Frid’s pattern

Session Subject
First General orientation, ability to recognize problems, accepting problems as natural and changeable phenomena, believing in the effectiveness of problem solving when facing difficulties, great self-efficacy expectations in order to perform stages, being used to cessation, thinking, and then trying to solve problems.
Second Definition and formation of problems, gathering all the available information, separating facts from assumptions which need research, analyzing problems, setting real goals.
Third Producing alternative solutions, determining a spectrum of probable solutions, possibility to select the most effective response from responses.
Fourth Decision, prediction of probable consequences of each measure, attention to the usefulness of these consequences.
Fifth Performing solutions, performing selected methods.
Sixth Review, observation of results obtained from performance and evaluation.

The tools used in this study included a demography questionnaire, Rozenberg’s self-esteem scale [3,11], and a behavioral adjustment questionnaire [1].

Demography questionnaire: Scholars were provided this questionnaire to receive personal information from respondents. In this questionnaire, there were items such as respondents’ age and education.

Rozenberg’s Self-esteem order: Rozenberg’s self-esteem order that was made by Rosenberg in 1965 measures the general self-esteem and personal value. This scale included ten common objects that measured life pleasure and having a great feeling of oneself [12]. Based on the Bornet & Right (2002), Rozenberg’s self-esteem order (SER) is one of the most popular orders for measuring self-esteem; and it is a well-recognized order, since, for self-esteem, it employs a theory similar to the one presented in mental theories about oneself. SER was formed to give a general image of positive and negative attitudes to oneself (Rosenberg, 1979). Using Cronbach’s alpha, Rosenberg described the safety of the questionnaire to be 0.89. This order has determined relationship coefficients similar to Cooper Smith’s self-esteem survey (SEI); and when estimating the levels of self-esteem, it has excellent efficacy (Grifits et al., 1997). To perform this test, an order has to be allocated to respondents and the respondents are requested to declare their opinion by choosing items such as “I agree” or “I disagree”. Rosenberg stated the reformation of the order to be 0.9 and the scalability of the order to be 0.7 [22]. In the first turn, Cronbach’s alpha factor for this order was 0.87 for males and 0.86 for females; and, in the second round, it was 0.88 for males and 0.87 for females. The relationship of retest was in a range of 0.82 and 0.88, and the internal flexibility coefficient or Cronbach’s alpha was between of 0.77 and 0.88 (Newton et al., 1999). This order had acceptable validity (0.77).

Behavioral adjustment questionnaire: This questionnaire, which has 78 items, was designed and normalized by Sajedi in 1996, including three general dimensions: emotion (questions 1-6, 13, 16, 21-37, 40, 41, 43, 47-52), cognition (questions 8-12, 14, 15, 17-20, 38, 39, 42, 44-46, 53-59), and education (questions 61-78). Each of the questions was on a six-point Likert scale (always to never). The validity and confirmation of this survey was stated to be effective in various studies. Using Cronbach’s alpha, Sajedi (1996) calculated the validity of the rate and stated it to be 0.91, 0.84, and 0.90 for emotion, cognition, and education, respectively, which were favorable. Also, the validity of the questionnaire was measured by Faramarzi, Asgari, and Taghavi (2013) [14]. Using Cronbach’s alpha, internal correlation of this scale was calculated to be 0.77 for emotion, 0.79 for cognition, and 0.78 for education. Also, in a study, using Cronbach’s alpha, Khodapanahi and Khaksarboldaji (2009) [10] calculated the reliability of the questionnaire to be 0.95 for the sub-scale of emotion dimension, 0.89 for the cognition sub-dimension, and 0.99 for the education sub-dimension. Additionally, using Cronbach’s alpha, its validity is calculated to be 0.91 for variables, which shows high consistency in the scale. This questionnaire was examined by some experts to determine validity; the validity of the questionnaire was calculated to be 0.86 (Sajedi, 2001) [14].

To analyze data, SPSS-20 software was used. In a statistical method for analyzing the data obtained from the study in a descriptive statistics level, indexes like average, nominal deviation, frequency, and frequency percentage were used; also within an inferential statistics stage, the tests of a single-variable and multivariate covariance analysis were used.

Research Findings

The demographic characteristics of the present sample are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics of the present sample

group age frequency frequency percentage
Problem-solving 12 1 6.7
13 4 20
14 6 40
15 6 40
16 3 13.3
Mean and standard deviation 14/ 40 ± 1/ 14
control 12 5 25
13 1 5
14 4 20
15 7 35
16 2 10
17 1 5
Mean and standard deviation 14/ 15 ± 1/ 53
group education frequency frequency percentage
Problem-solving Elementary 10 50
Junior high school 10 50
control Elementary 11 55
Junior high school 9 45

As shown in Table 3, in the experiment group, the average of self-esteem, emotion, cognition, and education scores in the post-test level has increased compared to the control group.

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for the scores of research variables in the two groups based on pre-test and post-test

component index experiment check
Pre Post Pre Post
Self-esteem Average 2.35 7.70 3.15 3.30
Nominal deviation 1.22 1.21 0.98 1.03
Emotion dimension Average 82.05 108.55 92.70 93.01
Nominal deviation 7.93 13.48 10.96 11.23
Cognition dimension Average 54.50 112.40 10.37 11.26
Nominal deviation 5.33 16.22 51.95 52.85
Education dimension Average 45.60 91.80 51.95 52.85
Nominal deviation 5.03 20.89 6.72 6.26

As presented in Table 4, the assumption of zero about the equality of variances of both groups in self-esteem and dimensions such as emotion, cognition, and emotion were approved. For example for all the variables of self-esteem and emotion, cognition, and emotion, behavioral adjustment of variances in two groups in the society were equal, with no significant differences. Therefore, following Lon’s pre-hypothesis, it was possible to perform a covariance analysis of results to examine the hypothesis of the study.

Table 4.

Results of Lon’s test in examining the consistency of variances, self-esteem, and its behavioral adjustment dimensions in the post-test level

variable stage F Degree of freedom 1 Degree of freedom 2 Significance level
Self-esteem Post-test 0.250 1 38 0.620
Emotion dimension Post-test 0.384 1 38 0.539
Cognition dimension Post-test 0.569 1 38 0.455
Education dimension Post-test 0.434 1 38 0.614

As shown in Table 5, the clear stage of all exams (p > 0.001) showed that at least in one of the related parameters (behavioral adjustment dimensions and self-esteem), there was a clear distinction between the 2 teams. In addition, according to the eta square, 0.74 percent of the observed differences between individuals were related to the effect of independent variable, i.e. intervention method (training problem-solving skills). On the other hand, because the statistical competence was 0.95 percent (greater than 0.80 percent), the sample size was acceptable. Results were connected to the significant difference of each dependent variable presented below.

Table 5.

Results of multivariate covariance analysis on post-test scores by controlling pre-test in self-esteem and dimensions such as emotion, cognition, and cognitive-adaptive education

Test title value F Degree of freedom Significance level Squared Eta competence
Pylayy effect 0.744 34.935 3 0.001 0.744 0.95
Wilks Lambda 0.256 34.935 3 0.001 0.744 0.95
Hotelling effect 8.416 34.935 3 0.001 0.744 0.95
Ray’s largest root 8.416 34.935 3 0.001 0.744 0.95

Based on the information presented in Table 6, since the significance level was p > 0.001, the assumption that there was a difference of self-esteem, and behavioral adjustment dimensions between the two groups were approved. Also, it was stated that 0.80 percent of the changes in the score of self-esteem, 0.29 percent of changes in the score of emotion, 0.74 percent of changes in the score of cognition, and 0.62 percent of changes in the score of education were due to an independent variable (training problem-solving skills). Therefore, the training problem-solving skills helped increase self-esteem and behavioral adjustment dimensions in students.

Table 6.

Results of multivariate covariance analysis for the examination of the effect of training problem-solving skills on self-esteem and behavioral adjustment dimensions in post-test level

index Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean of squares F Significance level Eta square
Self-esteem 193.601 1 193.601 152.009 0.001 0.801
Emotion dimension 2418.025 1 2418.025 15.699 0.001 0.292
Cognition dimension 21206.025 1 21206.025 108.701 0.001 0.741
Education dimension 15171.025 1 15171.025 63.774 0.001 0.627

Conclusion

According to the current research which aimed to examine the effect of training issue-solving experiment on the self-esteem and behavioral adjustment in teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents, the findings obtained from analyzing the single-variable and multivariate covariance showed that training problem-solving skills have a significant effect on self-esteem and behavioral adjustment in girls with irresponsible parents or no parents. This finding is in congruence with findings obtained from studies conducted by Mahmudi Rad, Arasteh, Afgheh and Barati (2008) [19], Ghanbari Hashemabadi and Shahabi (2009) [16], Baghayi Moghadam, Malak Pour, Amiri and Molavi (2012) [4], and Botvin & Griffin (2004) [27].

Ghanbari Hashemabadi and Shahabi (2009) [16] stated that training an important skill like problem-solving and receiving a positive feedback helps increase confidence in the society. Also, Botvin & Griffin (2004) [27] reported that training life skills in groups helps decrease unpleasant states such as lack of trust. Because by getting together in a group and feeling that others have the same problems as us, we can use each other’s experiences to confront problems and prevent unpleasant emotions or disorders such as anxiety and stress. Baghayi Moghadam, Malak Pour, Amiri and Molavi (2012) [4] also stated that training life skills in groups and placing individuals in a group sharing similar problems have significant impacts on interpersonal relationships, leading to a decrease in anxiety, which helps increase self-confidence.

Baghayi Moghadam, Malak Pour, Amiri and Molavi (2012) [4] also stated that training life skills like problem-solving in groups significantly helps improve self-esteem. By gathering in groups and feeling that others have similar problems with ours, we can share our experiences to confront difficulties. On the other hand, training life skills helps individuals learn more about themselves, know their weaknesses and strengths, solve their problems, and strengthen their positive points, which leads to an increase in confidence.

Moreover, the findings of the present study showed that training problem-solving skills affect adjustment components (emotion, cognition, and education) in teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents in Karaj. Findings obtained from a multivariate covariance analysis showed that training problem-solving skills significantly affects adjustment dimensions such as emotion, cognition, and education in teenage girls with irresponsible parents or no parents. This finding is in congruence with results obtained from studies conducted by Moradi and Kalantari (2007) [20,21], Hajamini et al. (2009) [7], Khalatbari, Ghorban Shirudi and Mablaghi (2011) [15], and Bapiri et al. (2011) [2].

Moradi and Kalantari (2007) [21] stated that training life skills like problem solving have as final goal the improvement of interpersonal relationships in social life, which enhances social skills. However, some experts believe that social skills and adjustment are equal and have the same meaning. In conclusion, training life skills and developing social skills lead to an increase in individuals’ adjustment. Hatami and Kawsian (2014) [6] stated that teaching life skills, such as problem solving and practicing them in everyday life, help people control their behavior and adjust their social interactions in an adaptive way. Additionally, it helps them understand others and predict that all these things significantly increase the individuals’ adjustment.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Welfare Organizations for their help. Additionally, they would also like to thank all the participants in the study.

References

  • 1.Aghmohammadi M. Examination of behavioral adjustment in junior high school students in Behbahan. Psychology BA thesis, Psychology University, and educative sciences. Islamic Azad University, Malayer Branch. 2007 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bapiri O, Bahamin Gh, Feizollahi Ali. Examining the effect of problem-solving group training on some psychological characteristics in teenagers committing suicide. Scientific Journal of Ilam Medical Science University. 2011;18(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bashlideh K, Yusefi N, Haghighi J, Behrouzi N. Examining the factorial structure of Rozenberg’s self-esteem with three word-processing forms in students of Shahid Chamran University in Ahwaz: positive, negative, and half the materials: positive, and the other half: negative. Educative Psychology Studies. 2013;9(15):41–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baghayi Moghadam G, Malak Pour M, Sholeh A, Hossein M. Effect of training life skills on anxiety, happiness, and anger control in adolescents with the physical disability. Behavioral Sciences Journal. 2012;5(4):5–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Behpazhuh A, Soleimani M, Afrouz Gh, Lavasani M. Effect of training social skills on social adjustment and slow learners' educational performance. Educational innovations. 2011;9(33):163–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hatami M, Kawsian J. Effect of training life skills on the adjustment of dedicated and martyred parents’ children. Scholastic Psychology. 2014;2(2):44–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hajamini Z, Ajali A, Fathi Ashtiani A, et al. Effect of training life skills on adolescents’ emotional reactions. Behavioral Sciences Journal. 2009;2(3):17–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoseinpour Sh, Rasulzadeh T, Khodapanahi M, et al. Examining the relationship between adjustment levels and adolescents’ personality traits. Behavioral Sciences Journal. 2009;2(2):97–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khodabakhshi A, Rastak H, Mansour L, et al. The relationship between nutritional habits with a bodily image and anxiety in adolescents. Psychotherapy. 2015;2(4):12–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khodapanahi M, Khaksarboldaji MA. The relationship between religious orientation and psychological adjustment in students. Psychology Quarterly. 2015;9(3):10–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rajabi GhR, Bohlul N. Measuring reliability and validity of Rozenberg’s self-esteem of first-year students in Shahid Chamran University. Educative and Psychological Studies. 2008;3(2):33–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Safaralizadeh F, Partoazam H, Habibpour Z. Correlation of depression and body mass in female adolescents in Khoy. Correlation of depression and body mass in female adolescents in Khoy. 2011;5(1):17–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ashouri M, Jalilabkenar S. Practical hints for training students with learning disorders. Exceptional Education. 2013 ;13(3):31–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Faramarzi S, Asgari K, Taghavi F. Effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on the adjustment of high school students with abnormal grieving. Behavioral Sciences Research Journal. 2013 ;10(5):43–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ghorbanshiroudi Sh, Khalatbari J, Toudar R, Mablaghi N, Salehi M. Comparing the effect of training assertiveness skills with the effect of training problem-solving methods on adjustment and aggression in female first-year high-school students. New Findings in Psychology. 2011;3(8):12–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ghanbari Hashemabadi B, Shahabi M. Examining the effect of training critical thinking on self-esteem and problem-solving skills in female high school students. Educative Psychology (Psychology and Educative sciences) 2009;4(12):10–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kazemi A, Fahimi S, Mojtabayi M. Expressing psychological clinical symptoms in adolescents based on Gary’s personality biological pattern. Medical Sciences University Journal in Mazandaran. 2014;23(1):204–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mojarrad Kahani AH, Ghanavi S. Effect of training communication skills on self-esteem in girls with physical disabilities. Research on Rehabilitation Sciences. 2013;8(3):261–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mahmudi Rad M, Arasteh HR, Afgheh S, Barati SF. Examining the role of training communication skills and social problem-solving on self-esteem and intelligence in third-grade elementary students. Rehabilitation. 2008;8(29):69–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moradi A, Dehnavi S. Comparative examination of the effect of group training for self-esteem, self-efficacy and motivation to progress on self-esteem women with physical disabilities. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2013;2(5):65–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moradi A, Kalantari M. Effect of training life skills on women’s mental silhouette, who have physical disabilities. Studying Exceptional Children. 2007;6(1):559–576. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Makund Hosseini Sh. Examining data incorporated in computer systems of 1480 telephone center, 123 social emergency, and prevalence of social traumas, and their classification in Semnan. Welfare Organization plan. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.World Health Organization. 2009 Available from: URL: HTTP: //www.who.int / topics/ adolescent health/en Accessed 16 June 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cooper Smith S. The antecedent of self-esteem. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1967. pp. 27–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Frieson TC. Relationship Between hope and self-esteem in Renal Transplant Recipients. Transplantation Proceeding. 2008;29:3739–3740. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(97)01092-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaplan VA, Sadock BH. Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical. 10th ed. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Botvin GJ, Griffin KW. Life skills training: empirical findings and future directions. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 2004;25(2):211–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Delavar A. Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences. Tehran: Edited Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medicine and Life are provided here courtesy of SC Jurnalul pentru Medicina si Viata SRL

RESOURCES