Table 2. Limited health literacy in various subgroups*1.
OR*2 | 95% CI | p-value | |
Sex | |||
Male | 0.95 | [0.78; 1.15] | 0.575 |
Female | Ref. | ||
Age (years) | |||
15–29 | Ref. | ||
30–45 | 1.07 | [0.80; 1.43] | 0.651 |
46–64 | 1.31 | [0.99; 1.74] | 0.056 |
65 and over | 1.83 | [1.36; 2.48] | <0.001 |
Education level | |||
Low | 1.32 | [0.99; 1.77] | 0.059 |
Intermediate | 0.92 | [0.71; 1.21] | 0.557 |
High | Ref. | ||
Immigration background | |||
No | Ref. | ||
Yes | 1.87 | [1.27; 2.75] | 0.002 |
Health insurance status | |||
Statutory | 0.73 | [0.49; 1.09] | 0.122 |
Private | Ref. | ||
Functional literacy skills | |||
Low | 1.94 | [1.49; 2.52] | <0.001 |
Adequate | Ref. | ||
Social status | |||
Low | 5.25 | [3.57; 7.72] | <0.001 |
Intermediate | 1.89 | [1.47; 2.43] | <0.001 |
High | Ref. |
Bold type shows significant differences
n = 1898; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference value
*1 Results of multiple logistic regression
*2 OR adjusted for all other variables in model; OR >1 indicates increased ?chance of l imited health literacy