Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 16;40(3):405–411. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1889

Table 3.

Multivariate linear regression of LV circumferential strain and ejection fraction in relation to cardiovascular risk factors

Ecc (%)
Ejection fraction (%)
Covariate β ± SE P value β ± SE P value
Age (per 10 years of age) 0.30 ± 0.13 0.0236 0.80 ± 0.35 0.0226
Sex (female vs. male) −0.44 ± 0.20 0.0318 1.77 ± 0.54 0.0012
Cohort (primary vs. secondary intervention) −0.15 ± 0.17 0.3926 0.34 ± 0.46 0.4592
Smoking (yes vs. no) 0.64 ± 0.27 0.0188 −0.16 ± 0.72 0.8184
BMI (kg/m2) 0.04 ± 0.02 0.0367 0.05 ± 0.05 0.3832
Mean diastolic BP (mmHg) 0.07 ± 0.02 0.0002 0.02 ± 0.05 0.7521
Mean HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) −0.02 ± 0.008 0.0236 0.02 ± 0.02 0.2383
Mean HbA1c during the DCCT/EDIC study 0.28 ± 0.10 0.0043 −0.20 ± 0.26 0.4343
Myocardial scar
 Nonischemic vs. none 1.13 ± 0.58 0.0518 −8.93 ± 1.54 <0.0001
 Ischemic vs. none −0.04 ± 0.58 0.9506 −3.67 ± 1.53 0.0164

Only the most significant lipid variable (i.e., HDL cholesterol) was included in the final model. The model was also adjusted for CMR machine type. Positive regression coefficients indicate a decrease in function because Ecc has a negative value. Boldface values indicate significance or clear trend at P ≤ 0.05.