Table 5.
Random intercepts and 95% CI for membership in each latent class compared to membership in all other latent classes. Counts are based on most likely class membership.
| MSA | Class CT: Census tract- concentrated (n=94) |
Class CL: County- concentrated local potential risk (n=177) |
Class CD: County- concentrated disperse potential risk (n=141) |
Class ML: MSA- concentrated local potential risk (n=88) |
Class MD: MSA- concentrated disperse potential risk (n=88) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta | 0.0 (−0.4, 0.5) | −0.3 (−1.1, 0.5) | −0.4 (−0.9, 0.2) | 0.5 (−0.5, 1.4) | 1.1 (0.1, 2.1) |
| Chicago | 0.0 (−0.4, 0.5) | 0.5 (−0.2, 1.2) | 0.0 (−0.5, 0.5) | −0.8 (−1.9, 0.2) | −0.2 (−1.3, 0.8) |
| Dallas | −0.3 (−0.7, 0.2) | 0.2 (−0.6, 1.0) | 0.2 (−0.4, 0.7) | 0.5 (−0.5, 1.5) | 0.0 (−1.1, 1.1) |
| Houston | 0.2 (−0.2, 0.7) | 0.7 (−0.1, 1.5) | −0.1 (−0.7, 0.5) | −0.9 (−2.2, 0.3) | −1.0 (−2.3, 0.4) |
| Los Angeles | 0.0 (−0.4, 0.5) | 0.7 (0, 1.3) | 0.4 (0, 0.9) | −1.4 (−2.5, −0.3) | −1.4 (−2.5, −0.3) |
| Miami | 0.1 (−0.4, 0.6) | 0.2 (−0.6, 1.0) | 0.2 (−0.4, 0.7) | −0.1 (−1.2, 1.0) | −0.8 (−2.2, 0.5) |
| New York | −0.2 (−0.6, 0.2) | −1.0 (−1.6, −0.3) | −0.3 (−0.7, 0.2) | 1.2 (0.4, 2) | 1.2 (0.4, 2.1) |
| Philadelphia | 0.0 (−0.4, 0.5) | −0.4 (−1.1, 0.4) | −0.1 (−0.6, 0.5) | 0.2 (−0.8, 1.2) | 0.8 (−0.2, 1.8) |
| Washington, DC | 0.0 (−0.4, 0.4) | −0.6 (−1.3, 0.1) | 0.1 (−0.4, 0.6) | 0.9 (0, 1.8) | 0.3 (−0.7, 1.3) |