Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2016 Nov 10;25(3):813–824. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.11.013

Table 4.

Comparison of binding interactions for (10) in crystal and docked structures

Distancea,b EcMetAP1 Actual RpMetAP1 Docked
Mn(II) Chelation 2.2, 2.3 1.7, 2.1
Mn(II) Coordination 2.0 1.8
π - π Stacking (Tyr62) 4.0 3.1
Hydrophobic (His63) 3.5 6.9c
Hydrophobic (Tyr65) 3.6 3.5
Hydrophobic (His79) 3.6 3.9
Hydrophobic (Phe177) 4.0 3.3
Hydrophobic (His178) 3.3 3.6
Hydrophobic (Trp221) 3.4 3.1

Angle

Mn(II) – OL – Mn(II) Angle 107° 155°
(10) Dihedral 41° 18°
a

Distances correspond to closest observed interaction and are reported in Å

b

Residue numbering corresponds to EcMetAP1 (PDB: 1XNZ)12

c

This is a non-conserved residue and exists as Lys in RpMetAP