Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiother Oncol. 2016 Nov 24;122(2):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.005

Table 2.

Variable selection results and model performance for the two follow-up times in the MSKCC cohort based on the candidate predictors in this cohort (cf. Table 1).

MSKCC
Follow-up: Short Follow-up: Long
Model AUC Rs p β pHL Model AUC Rs p β pHL
Dmeancontra* 0.78 (0.07) 0.46 (0.12) 0.01 (0.07) 0.14 0.51 (0.23) Dmeancontra 0.80 (0.07) 0.28 (0.18) 0.18 (0.21) 0.07 0.39 (0.19)
Dmeanipsi* 0.85 (0.06) 0.50 (0.13) 0.01 (0.04) 0.09 0.24 (0.11) Dmeanipsi 0.73 (0.09) 0.24 (0.16) 0.25 (0.27) 0.03 0.43 (0.10)
WMSFM Pre-RT* 0.71 (0.09) 0.45 (0.13) 0.02 (0.08) 0.84 0.51 (0.12)
Tumor site 0.69 (0.08) 0.28 (0.13) 0.13 (0.20) 0.14 0.46 (0.13)
Chemotherapy* 0.65 (0.04) 0.33 (0.07) 0.04 (0.05) 135 0.19 (0.07)

Dmeancontra+Dmeanipsi** 0.90 (0.05) 0.66 (0.12) 0.0002 (0.002) 0.17/0.11 0.22 (0.23)
WMSFM Pre-RT+Dmeanipsi 0.85 (0.06) 0.64 (0.12) 0.001 (0.01) 0.85/0.09 0.45 (0.24)

Note: The AUC, Rs, p, and pHL are given as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) over the 1000 bootstrap samples.

*

Qualified for MVA,

**

Most frequently selected model (38%).