Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;105(3):589–599. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.139683

TABLE 4.

Stool characteristics before and after 6 wk of consumption of a refined grain–based or whole grain–rich diet1

Refined grain Whole grain P 2
n Week 23 ΔWeeks 2–84 n Week 23 ΔWeeks 2–84 β ± SE5 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Stool weight, g wet weight/d 39 91 (84) −10 (−26, 7) 40 87 (101) 62 (42, 82) 76 ± 12 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Stool energy density, kcal/g dry weight 39 5.0 ± 0.3 −0.03 (−0.13, 0.07) 40 5.1 ± 0.4 −0.07 (−0.18, 0.05) −0.03 ± 0.06 0.67 0.69 0.67
Total stool energy, kcal/d 39 125 (98) −23 (−46, 1) 40 128 (107) 69 (35, 102) 96 ± 18 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Fiber-adjusted total stool energy,6 kcal/d 39 75 (103) −23 (−46, −1) 40 82 (111) 30 (−4, 63) 57 ± 17 0.001 0.002 0.003
1

There were no significant differences during week 2.

2

Determined with the use of an ANCOVA. Model 1 was adjusted for the baseline value of the outcome; model 2 was adjusted as for model 1 and for age, sex, and baseline BMI; and model 3 was adjusted as for model 2 and for weight change.

3

Values are means ± SDs or medians (IQRs).

4

All values are means (95% CIs).

5

Obtained from model 1 with refined grain as the reference group.

6

Calculated as total stool energy – total fiber intake × 2.2 kcal/g. The mean nonmetabolizable energy of fiber is 2.2 kcal/g (44).