TABLE 2.
Alkylresorcinol concentrations of participants at baseline (week 2) and follow-up (week 8)1
RG group |
WG group |
|||||||||
Measure | Baseline | Follow-up | ΔRG | P | Baseline | Follow-up | ΔWG | P | ΔWG − ΔRG | P |
19:0, nmol/L | 12.24 ± 2.74 | 12.68 ± 1.88 | 0.44 ± 2.42 | 0.16 | 8.59 ± 1.31 | 64.17 ± 7.64 | 55.59 ± 7.29 | <0.0001 | 55.15 ± 7.76 | <0.0001 |
21:0, nmol/L | 11.31 ± 2.30 | 14.06 ± 2.43 | 2.75 ± 2.84 | 0.08 | 12.30 ± 2.39 | 116.97 ± 15.55 | 104.67 ± 13.82 | <0.0001 | 101.90 ± 14.27 | <0.0001 |
23:0, nmol/L | 3.07 ± 0.58 | 3.86 ± 0.72 | 0.79 ± 0.81 | 0.75 | 3.14 ± 0.69 | 16.89 ± 2.76 | 13.75 ± 2.29 | <0.0001 | 12.96 ± 2.46 | <0.0001 |
Total alkylresorcinol, nmol/L | 26.62 ± 4.10 | 30.60 ± 3.76 | 3.98 ± 4.96 | 0.90 | 24.02 ± 3.65 | 198.03 ± 24.27 | 174.01 ± 21.89 | <0.0001 | 170.00 ± 22.70 | <0.0001 |
All values are means ± SEMs. n = 40 in the RG group, and n = 41 in the WG group. There were no differences between groups at baseline. P values were obtained with the use of an ANCOVA and controlling for the baseline measure, BMI, age, and sex. RG, refined grain; WG, whole grain.