Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;105(3):635–650. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.146928

TABLE 2.

Alkylresorcinol concentrations of participants at baseline (week 2) and follow-up (week 8)1

RG group
WG group
Measure Baseline Follow-up ΔRG P Baseline Follow-up ΔWG P ΔWG − ΔRG P
19:0, nmol/L 12.24 ± 2.74 12.68 ± 1.88 0.44 ± 2.42 0.16 8.59 ± 1.31 64.17 ± 7.64 55.59 ± 7.29 <0.0001 55.15 ± 7.76 <0.0001
21:0, nmol/L 11.31 ± 2.30 14.06 ± 2.43 2.75 ± 2.84 0.08 12.30 ± 2.39 116.97 ± 15.55 104.67 ± 13.82 <0.0001 101.90 ± 14.27 <0.0001
23:0, nmol/L 3.07 ± 0.58 3.86 ± 0.72 0.79 ± 0.81 0.75 3.14 ± 0.69 16.89 ± 2.76 13.75 ± 2.29 <0.0001 12.96 ± 2.46 <0.0001
Total alkylresorcinol, nmol/L 26.62 ± 4.10 30.60 ± 3.76 3.98 ± 4.96 0.90 24.02 ± 3.65 198.03 ± 24.27 174.01 ± 21.89 <0.0001 170.00 ± 22.70 <0.0001
1

All values are means ± SEMs. n = 40 in the RG group, and n = 41 in the WG group. There were no differences between groups at baseline. P values were obtained with the use of an ANCOVA and controlling for the baseline measure, BMI, age, and sex. RG, refined grain; WG, whole grain.