Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;105(3):635–650. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.146928

TABLE 5.

Relative abundance of bacteria phyla in stool samples of participants at baseline (week 2) and follow-up (week 8)1

RG group
WG group
Phylum Baseline Follow-up ΔRG P Baseline Follow-up ΔWG P ΔWG − ΔRG P
Firmicutes, % of total microbiota 51.41 ± 3.00 48.61 ± 2.74 −2.80 ± 2.87 0.97 43.29 ± 2.57 43.57 ± 2.33 0.28 ± 2.70 0.94 3.08 ± 2.75 0.94
Bacteroidetes, % of total microbiota 38.66 ± 2.85 45.33 ± 3.13 6.67 ± 0.43 0.91 49.13 ± 2.73 50.2 ± 2.33 1.07 ± 2.79 0.94 −5.6 ± 1.61 0.97
Proteobacteria, % of total microbiota 2.96 ± 0.65 2.32 ± 0.29 −0.64 ± 0.49 0.91 3.30 ± 0.53 3.05 ± 0.43 −0.25 ± 0.48 0.94 0.39 ± 0.49 0.97
Actinobacteria, % of total microbiota 1.74 ± 0.43 1.56 ± 0.33 −0.18 ± 0.39 0.91 1.59 ± 0.44 1.05 ± 0.28 −0.54 ± 0.36 0.94 −0.36 ± 0.37 0.89
Tenericutes, % of total microbiota 1.45 ± 0.54 0.73 ± 0.26 −0.72 ± 0.42 0.91 0.73 ± 0.31 0.71 ± 0.28 −0.02 ± 0.29 0.94 0.70 ± 0.43 0.89
Verrucomicrobia, % of total microbiota 0.45 ± 0.11 0.71 ± 0.28 0.26 ± 0.27 0.91 0.26 ± 0.1 0.39 ± 0.14 0.13 ± 0.12 0.94 −0.13 ± 0.20 0.94
Cyanobacteria, % of total microbiota 0.63 ± 0.58 0.01 ± 0.01 −0.62 ± 0.01 0.97 0.13 ± 0.1 0.07 ± 0.06 −0.06 ± 1.09 0.94 0.56 ± 0.55 0.97
Fusobacteria, % of total microbiota 1.75 ± 1.74 0.02 ± 0.01 −1.73 ± 0.01 0.93 1.07 ± 0.61 0.72 ± 0.44 −0.35 ± 0.74 0.94 1.38 ± 0.38 0.94
Lentisphaerae, % of total microbiota 0.02 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.02 0.91 0.07 ± 0.07 0.02 ± 0.01 −0.05 ± 0.04 0.94 −0.06 ± 0.03 0.89
1

All values are means ± SEMs. n = 40 in the RG group, and n = 39 in the WG group. There were no differences between groups at baseline. P values were obtained with the use of a linear model; covariates in the model included age, BMI, and sex with false-discovery rate correction for multiple testing. RG, refined grain; WG, whole grain.