TABLE 6.
RG group |
WG group |
|||||||||
Phylum | Baseline | Follow-up | ΔRG | P | Baseline | Follow-up | ΔWG | P | ΔWG − ΔRG | P |
Lachnospira, % of total microbiota | 2.16 ± 0.37 | 1.31 ± 0.26 | −0.85 ± 0.31 | 0.99 | 1.71 ± 0.26 | 1.90 ± 0.41 | 0.19 ± 0.34 | 1.00 | 1.04 ± 0.33 | 0.25 |
Roseburia, % of total microbiota | 1.88 ± 0.29 | 1.48 ± 0.19 | −0.40 ± 0.24 | 0.99 | 1.89 ± 0.38 | 2.81 ± 0.46 | 0.92 ± 0.42 | 1.00 | 1.32 ± 0.33 | 0.30 |
Enterobacteriaceae, % of total microbiota | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.99 | 0.33 ± 0.17 | 0.30 ± 0.20 | −0.03 ± 0.19 | 1.00 | −0.07 ± 0.11 | 0.25 |
All values are means ± SEMs. n = 40 in the RG group, and n = 39 in the WG group. There were no differences between groups at baseline. P values were obtained with the use of a linear model; covariates in the model included age, BMI, and sex with false-discovery rate correction for multiple testing. RG, refined grain; WG, whole grain.