Table 3.
Hierarchical regressions for the impact of supervisor feedback environment and self-concordance on creative performance.
| Goal self-concordance as dependent variable |
Creative performance as dependent variable |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| Gender | -0.01 | 0.07 | -0.01 | -0.01 |
| Age | -0.03 | -0.06 | -0.01 | 0.01 |
| Education | -0.26 | -0.23 | -0.17 | -0.11 |
| Tenure | -0.20 | -0.16 | 0.05 | 0.1 |
| Supervisor feedback environment | 0.29** | 0.27** | 0.23** | 0.16 |
| Goal self-concordance | 0.24** | |||
| Creative personality | 0.23** | |||
| Supervisor feedback environment × creative personality | 0.14* | |||
| R2 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| ΔR2 | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.1 |
| F | 9.43** | 10.36** | 2.93* | 3.81** |
n = 162; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01; values are standardized coefficients.