Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0529-7

Table 3.

Associations between SEP and reporting four or five dental problems—adults ages 30 – 64 years

Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 4d
OR (CI95%) p OR (CI95%) p OR (CI95%) p OR (CI95%) p
Level of Education
Universitye ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ---- ---
 Secondary 2.33 (1.80–3.01) .000 2.05 (1.58–2.66) .000 1.96 (1.59–2.33) .000 1.62 (1.26–1.97) .000
 Primary 3.69 (2.86–4.77) .000 2.82 (2.16–3.67) .000 2.57 (2.14–3.00) .000 1.89 (1.48–2.29) .000
 No formal education 6.54 (4.80–8.91) .000 4.58 (3.31–6.34) .000 4.38 (3.68–5.08) .000 2.94 (2.31–3.57) .000
n = 17,267 (98%) n = 16,920 (96%) n = 16,198 (92%)
F–adjusted = 0.66 (p = 0.746) F–adjusted = 0.95 (p = 0.481) F-adjusted = 1.06 (p = 0.388)
log pseudolikelihood = −6741427.9 log pseudolikelihood = −6364312.7 log pseudolikelihood = −5910612.5
Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c
OR (CI95%) p OR (CI95%) p OR (CI95%) p
Household Equivalent
Income ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ---- ---
 Quartile 4 (highest)e 1.68 (1.37–1.98) .000 1.54 (1.24–1.84) .000 1.49 (1.19–1.79) .002 1.25 (0.96–1.53) .089
 Quartile 3 2.20 (1.82–2.58) .000 1.80 (1.45–2.15) .000 1.73 (1.40–2.07) .000 1.35 (1.05–1.65) .022
 Quartile 2 3.62 (3.17–4.07) .000 2.77 (2.36–3.18) .000 2.46 (2.06–2.87) .000 1.80 (1.43–2.16) .000
 Quartile 1
n = 17,332 (98%) n = 16,979 (96%) n = 16,246 (92%)
log pseudolikelihood = −6807884.4 log pseudolikelihood = −6413004.9 log pseudolikelihood = −5969405.4
F-adjusted = 0.56 (p = 0.827) F-adjusted = 0.99 (p = 0.445) F-adjusted = 0.95 (p = 0.480)
Occupational class
 I (highest)e ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- ---- ---
 II 1.56 (1.06–2.31) .025 1.37 (0.92–2.04) .121 1.35 (0.88–1.82) .142 1.09 (0.67–1.51) .674
 III 2.08 (1.48–2.93) .000 1.78 (1.26–2.52) .002 1.60 (1.15–2.04) .009 1.10 (0.73–1.48) .587
 IV 2.94 (2.13–4.07) .000 2.27 (1.63–3.17) .000 2.13 (1.63–2.62) .000 1.26 (0.86–1.65) .208
 V 3.61 (2.53–5.16) .000 2.55 (1.77–3.66) .000 2.35 (1.77–2.92) .000 1.25 (0.81–1.69) .270
n = 17,111 (97%) n = 16,778 (95%) n = 16,068 (91%) n = 16,023 (91%)
log pseudolikelihood = −6790156.0 log pseudolikelihood = −6382456.4 log pseudolikelihood = −5941464.8 log pseudolikelihood = −5823027.6
F-adjusted = 0.28 (p = 0.979) F-adjusted = 0.60 (p = 0.798) F-adjusted = 0.90 (p = 0.527) F-adjusted = 1.52 (p = 0.137)

Models 1, 2 and 3 were built separately for each indicator of SEP. Model 4 is one single model with the three indicators of SEP included simultaneously

aModel 1: adjusted by demographic variables (age in groups, sex, area of residence, and marital status)

bModel 2: adjusted by demographic and behavioral variables (smoking, sweet and sweetened beverage intake, toothbrushing, and dental visits)

cModel 3: adjusted by demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial variables (mental health, social support, family function, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Work-related stress and job satisfaction with imputed data)

dModel 4: adjusted by demographic, behavioral, psychosocial, and socioeconomic variables (income, work-related stress, and job satisfaction with imputed data). To avoid multicollinearity, the degree of correlation between socioeconomic variables was measured. The highest correlation found (between education and occupational class) was moderate (Spearman’s rho = 0.47; p < 0.001)

eReference category