Table 2.
Regional SCC
| Region | SCC 2015, $/tCO2, 2010 $ | RICE 2010, % global | FUND 2013, % global | PAGE 2011, % global | This study, % global |
| United States | 4.78 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 15 |
| EU | 4.79 | 12 | 24 | 9 | 15 |
| Japan | 1.07 | 2 | 3 | na | 3 |
| Russia | 0.91 | 1 | 10 | na | 3 |
| Eurasia | 1.56 | 1 | na | na | 5 |
| China | 6.61 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 21 |
| India | 2.93 | 12 | 5 | 22 | 9 |
| Middle East | 2.16 | 10 | na | na | 7 |
| Africa | 1.03 | 11 | 6 | 26 | 3 |
| Latin America | 1.87 | 7 | na | 11 | 6 |
| Other high income | 1.00 | 4 | na | na | 3 |
| Other | 2.50 | 12 | [28] | [16] | 8 |
| Global | 31.21 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
This table distributes the global SCC from Table 1 by region. The first and last columns assume that the SCC is proportional to the discounted value of output in each region over the 2020–2050 period, discounted at a discount rate of 5% per year. na, not available in the source document; tCO2, metric tons of CO2. Brackets around estimates are total of omitted regions.