Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 21;119(2):253–265. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw161

Table 3.

Post-hoc tests of treatment effects within populations when the population × treatment interaction was significant in ANOVA models evaluating the effects of population identity and water treatments on the mean germination time (MGT) and fraction of dormant seeds (FDS) (see Table 1)

Treatment Population d.f. MGT
FDS
MS F P MS F P
TAS DL 2 6·60 0·41 0·66 0·03 1·10 0·33
BAF 2 100·68 6·31 <0·01 0·00 0·05 0·96
MF 2 38·34 2·40 0·09 0·18 5·89 <0·01
JP 2 41·63 2·61 0·08 0·14 4·52 0·01
BTM 2 35·86 2·25 0·11 0·30 9·96 <0·01
PVP 2 13·34 0·84 0·44 0·00 0·01 0·99
IL DL 1 0·00 0·15 0·70
BAF 1 0·55 18·14 <0·01
MF 1 0·25 8·20 <0·01
JP 1 0·05 1·79 0·18
BTM 1 0·05 1·71 0·19
PVP 1 0·00 0·04 0·85

The comparisons in this table reflect tests for differences among treatments within each population.

TAS, time of precipitation addition after summer treatment ended (three levels); IL, inundation length following watering event (two levels).