Table 3.
Treatment | Population | d.f. | MGT |
FDS |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS | F | P | MS | F | P | |||
TAS | DL | 2 | 6·60 | 0·41 | 0·66 | 0·03 | 1·10 | 0·33 |
BAF | 2 | 100·68 | 6·31 | <0·01 | 0·00 | 0·05 | 0·96 | |
MF | 2 | 38·34 | 2·40 | 0·09 | 0·18 | 5·89 | <0·01 | |
JP | 2 | 41·63 | 2·61 | 0·08 | 0·14 | 4·52 | 0·01 | |
BTM | 2 | 35·86 | 2·25 | 0·11 | 0·30 | 9·96 | <0·01 | |
PVP | 2 | 13·34 | 0·84 | 0·44 | 0·00 | 0·01 | 0·99 | |
IL | DL | 1 | 0·00 | 0·15 | 0·70 | |||
BAF | 1 | 0·55 | 18·14 | <0·01 | ||||
MF | 1 | 0·25 | 8·20 | <0·01 | ||||
JP | 1 | 0·05 | 1·79 | 0·18 | ||||
BTM | 1 | 0·05 | 1·71 | 0·19 | ||||
PVP | 1 | 0·00 | 0·04 | 0·85 |
The comparisons in this table reflect tests for differences among treatments within each population.
TAS, time of precipitation addition after summer treatment ended (three levels); IL, inundation length following watering event (two levels).