Table 4.
Author | No. of pts | Ann Arbor stage (%) | Treatment types (No. of pts) | CT regimen (No. of pts) | RT dose(cGy) | Response (%) | 5-year OS (%) | 5-year PFS (%) | ≥ Grade 3 Toxicity (n)a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avilés et al. (2013)b [2] | 427 |
|
|
CMED (318) | 5500 |
|
|
|
|
Li et al. (2013) [13] | 73 |
|
|
CHOP like | 46 | Median PFS 3yrs | |||
Wang et al. (2012) [21] | 42 |
|
|
CHOP like (19) | 5000 (median) |
95.2 | 78 (2-year) | 74 (2-year) | 7 |
Jayoung Lee et al. (2013) [25] | 24 |
|
|
|
4500 (median) |
83.3 | 70.3 | 66.2 |
|
Jieun Lee et al. (2013)b [26] | 43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jiang et al. (2012) [27] | 26 |
|
C/T→RT→C/T | L-VP (26) | 5600 | 88.5 | 88.5 (2-year) |
80.6 (2-year) |
2 |
Oh et al. (2015) [28] | 62 |
|
CCRT→C/T |
|
4000 | 96.7 | 83.1 (3-year) |
77.1 (3-year) |
3 |
Yang et al. (2015) [29] | 1273 |
|
|
|
5000 (median) |
93.3 |
|
|
– |
Present study | 37 |
|
|
|
5000 (median) |
91.2 | 76.3 (3-year) |
64.0 (3-year) |
6 |
C/T = chemotherapy, RT = radiotherapy, No. of pts = Number of patients, ProMACE-CytaBOM = cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + etoposide + cytozar + bleomycin + vincristine + methotrexate + prednisone, CHOP = cyclophosphamide + adriamycin + vincristine + prednisolone, L-VP = L-asparaginase + vincristine + prednisolone, CMED = cyclophosphamide + methotrexate + etoposide + dexamethasone, VIPD = etoposide + ifosfamide + cisplatin + dexamethasone, VIDL = etoposide + ifosfamide + dexamethasone followed by intramuscular injection of L-asparaginase, MIDLE = methotrexate + etoposide + ifosfamide + mesna + L-asparaginase, OS = overall survival, PFS = progression-free survival, SCRT = sequential chemoradiotherapy, CCRT = concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
aAcute toxicity according to CTCAE or RTOG, n as number of toxicity events.
bResponse, OS, PFS, toxicity according to different treatment types.