Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 7;1(1):e000020. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000020

Table 2.

Effects from the ITS models for district facility-based perinatal mortality rates, comparing intervention with control

Intervention
Control
Effect SE CI 95% p Value Relative effect (%) Effect SE CI 95% p Value Relative effect (%)
3 months −1.36 1.18 (−4.16 to 1.43) 0.286 −7 −9.14 2.98 (−16.18 to −2.09) 0.018 −27
6 months −1.73 1.36 (−4.94 to 148) 0.243 −9 −10.58 3.45 (−18.73 to −2.43) 0.018 −34
9 months −2.10 1.58 (−5.83 to 1.63) 0.224 −12 −12.02 4.03 (−21.54 to −2.50) 0.020 −36
12 months −2.47 1.83 (−6.79 to 1.84) 0.218 −14 −13.46 4.68 (−24.52 to −2.41) 0.024 −38
15 months −2.84 2.09 (−7.78 to 2.10) 0.216 −16 −14.91 5.37 (−27.60 to −2.21) 0.027 −42
18 months −3.21 2.37 (−8.81 to 2.38) 0.217 −19 −16.35 6.09 (−30.75 to −1.95) 0.031 −46
21 months −3.58 2.65 (−9.85 to 2.69) 0.219 −21 −17.79 6.83 (−33.95 to −1.64) 0.035 −47

Effect—estimate of effect from ARIMA ITS model.

Relative effect, percentage change (compared with preslope trend).

ITS, interrupted time series.