Table 3.

Cost-effectiveness of the differing models of secondary prevention care of hip fractures

Representative male*	Difference in costs	Difference in LYs	Difference in QALYs	ICER (£/LY)	ICER (£/QALY)	Prob that is the most cost-effective at £30,000/QALY
Usual care	-	-	-	-	-	0%
FLS vs. usual care	£1,975 (1297 to 2620)	0.159 (0.095 to 0.218)	0.099 (0.058 to 0.140)	£12,458	£19,955	31%
OG vs. fracture liaison nurse	£635 (-207 to 1496)	0.043 (-0.031 to 0.116)	0.027 (-0.019 to 0.074)	£14,898	£23,407	69%
Representative female
Usual care	-	-	-	-	-	0%
FLS vs. usual care	£1,909 (1271 to 2562)	0.149 (0.094 to 0.209)	0.093 (0.057 to 0.133)	£12,837	£20,421	28%
OG vs. fracture liaison nurse	£638 (-207 to 1418)	0.044 (-0.032 to 0.110)	0.028 (-0.020 to 0.071)	£14,618	£22,709	72%