Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2016 Aug 10;122(24):3812–3820. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30262

Table 3.

Univariate analysis for EFS and OS

Characteristic EFS OS
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age (years): ≥60 vs. 30–59 vs. ≤30 1.64 1.35–1.98 <0.001 1.82 1.49–2.22 <0.001
WBC (109/L): ≥40 vs. <40 2.00 1.36–2.92 0.001 1.91 1.32–2.76 0.001
Hemoglobin (g/dL): <10 vs. ≥10 1.32 0.97–1.80 0.08 1.36 0.98–1.89 0.06
Platelets (109/L): <100 vs. ≥100 1.33 1.10–1.60 0.003 1.28 1.06–1.55 0.01
Baseline BM blasts: ≥60% vs. <60% 0.72 0.46–1.13 0.15 0.65 0.40–1.06 0.08
LDH: ≥2xULN vs. <2xULN 1.23 0.93–1.63 0.14 1.11 0.83–1.48 0.48
PS: 2–4 vs. 0–1 1.76 1.23–2.53 0.002 1.97 1.36–2.84 <0.001
Diagnosis: B-ALL vs. T-ALL 1.18 0.81–1.71 0.40 1.24 0.85–1.81 0.26
Cytogenetics: poor vs. standard 1.64 1.15–2.33 0.006 1.70 1.20–2.42 0.003
Treatment: Hyper-CVAD vs. AugBFM 1.32 0.93–1.89 0.12 1.39 0.96–1.98 0.08
Cycles to CR/CRp: ≥2 vs. 1 1.72 1.26–2.35 0.001 1.69 1.23–2.32 0.001
MRD at CR/CRp: positive vs. negative 2.00 1.39–2.89 <0.001 2.33 1.61–3.37 <0.001
D14 BM blasts: ≥30%vs. 10–29% vs. <10% 1.57 1.32–1.86 <0.001 1.46 1.24–1.74 <0.001

EFS, event-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; WBC, white blood cell; BM, bone marrow; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ULN, upper limit of normal; PS, performance status; Hyper-CVAD, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone; AugBFM, augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster; CR, complete remission; CRp, CR with inadequate platelet recovery; MRD, minimal residual disease; D14, day 14