Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2016 Aug 1;122(23):3650–3656. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30231

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics after propensity score matching

No. (%) or Median (range) P
HCVAD + ponatinib [n=41] HCVAD + dasatinib [n=41]
Age, (y) 57 (27-80) 55 (22-75) 0.68
White blood cell count (×109/L) 8.5 (0.9-629.4) 12.2 (0.4-658.1) 0.87
Performance status
    0-1 35 (85) 37 (90) 0.74
    ≥2 6 (15) 4 (10)
Cytogenetic abnormalities
    Isolated Ph+ 6 (15) 6 (15) 0.98
    Ph+ and other 29 (71) 28 (68)
    Diploid, (Ph+ by FISH/PCR) 3 (7) 3 (7)
    Unknown, (Ph+ by FISH/PCR) 3 (7) 4 (10)
Transcript subtype
    B2A2 4 (10) 5 (12) 0.39
    B3A2 4 (10) 1 (2)
    B2A2 + B3A2 1 (2) 1 (2)
    E1A2 30 (73) 34 (83)
    E1A3 2 (5) 0
CD20 positivity, (%) 8.9 (0-100) 15.2 (0-98) 0.61
Rituximab therapy 14 (34) 12 (29) 0.64
CNS disease 3 (7) 3 (7) 1.00

Abbreviations: HCVAD, hyper-CVAD; Ph+, Philadelphia chromosome-positive; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CNS, central nervous system