Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Ecol Lett. 2015 Jun 1;18(8):790–798. doi: 10.1111/ele.12456

Table 1.

Summary results of the structural equation models performed with the different environmental factors (in rows) separately. Standardized total effects (STE; sum of direct and indirect effects) and standardized direct effects (SDE; equivalent to the path coefficient from the predictor to the response variable) for richness are shown. For intransitivity STE = SDE. Environmental factors were introduced as: Mowing (number of cuts per year), grazing (sheep/other, permanent/rotational/none) fertilization (yes/no), and water management (drainage/retention/none). Significant path coefficients are highlighted in bold.

Intransitivity Richness
SDE SDE STE
Mowing -0.16 -0.29 -0.31
Grazing 0.20 0.50 0.51
Fertilization -0.09 -0.44 -0.45
Water management (only NE region) 0.15 -0.46 -0.45
Aridity 0.20 -0.28 -0.23