Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Food Prot. 2016 Sep;79(9):1588–1598. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-085

TABLE 5.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of characteristics associated with restaurant managers, food workers, and servers scoring in the top 50% of food allergy knowledge scoresa

Characteristic OR (90% CI) P
Manager scored in top 50%b
  No. of meals served to allergic customers in the past month 0.003
    1–10 vs 0 1.48 (0.89, 2.48) 0.208
    >10 vs 1–10 2.33 (1.35, 4.04) 0.011
    >10 vs 0 3.45 (1.87, 6.36) 0.001
  Specific person to answer food allergy questions and requests
    Yes vs no 1.71 (1.09, 2.70) 0.052
Food worker scored in top 50%c
  Restaurant plan for answering questions from food allergic customers
    Yes vs no 4.23 (2.20, 8.12) <0.001
  Sex
    Female vs male 3.63 (1.81, 7.26) 0.002
  Experience in this restaurant
    ≥2 vs <2 yr 2.60 (1.43, 4.72) 0.009
  Highest priced food item on the menu 0.071
    $10–$20 vs <$10 2.72 (1.33, 5.56) 0.022
    >$20 vs $10–$20 0.68 (0.32, 1.42) 0.389
    >$20 vs <$10 1.84 (0.80, 4.24) 0.228
Server scored in top 50%d
  Specific person to answer food allergy questions and requests
    Yes vs no 2.49 (1.33, 4.66) 0.017
  Service type
    Full service vs quick service 2.71 (1.40, 5.24) 0.013
  No. of meals served in a typical day 0.077
    101–300 vs 1–100 1.03 (0.51, 2.05) 0.953
    >300 vs 101–300 2.54 (1.20, 5.38) 0.042
    >300 vs 1–100 2.60 (1.19, 5.69) 0.045
a

Overall models were created using a forward selection criterion of P < 0.10. Variables are presented in order of steps at which they entered the model. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. OR > 1 indicates that the odds of the outcome (knowledge score in top 50%) were greater for the first mentioned category (e.g., 1 to 10) than for the second mentioned category (e.g., 0).

b

χ2 = 17.18, df = 3, P < 0.001, N = 262.

c

χ2 = 30.50, df = 5, P < 0.001, N = 192.

d

χ2 = 16.97, df = 4, P = 0.002, N = 149.