Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Food Prot. 2016 Sep;79(9):1588–1598. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-085

TABLE 7.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of characteristics associated with restaurant managers, food workers, and servers scoring in the top 50% of food allergy attitude scoresa

Characteristic OR (90% CI) P
Manager scored in top 50%b
  No. of meals served to allergic customers in past month <0.001
    1–10 vs 0 1.29 (0.73, 2.28) 0.467
    >10 vs 1–10 3.72 (2.00, 6.92) 0.001
    >10 vs 0 4.80 (2.35, 9.77) <0.001
  Restaurant plan for answering questions from food allergic customers
    Yes vs no 2.77 (1.59, 4.81) 0.003
  Specific person to answer food allergy questions and requests
    Yes vs no 1.71 (1.02, 2.85) 0.085
  Allergen information on menu
    Yes vs no 0.42 (0.22, 0.79) 0.023
  Experience in this restaurant
    ≥4 vs <4 yr 0.57 (0.35, 0.94) 0.061
  Received food allergy training at this restaurant
    Yes vs no 1.71 (1.00, 2.92) 0.099
Food worker scored in top 50%c
  Restaurant plan for answering questions from food allergic customers
    Yes vs no 2.43 (1.33, 4.43) 0.015
  Highest level of education
    Some college or more vs high school diploma or less 3.35 (1.83, 6.14) 0.001
  Worker:manager ratio
    <5:1 vs ≥5:1 2.44 (1.37, 4.35) 0.011
  Restaurant type
    Chain vs independent 2.04 (1.13, 3.70) 0.048
Server scored in top 50%d
  Highest level of education
    Some college or more vs high school diploma or less 3.33 (1.80, 6.17) 0.001
  Received food allergy training at this restaurant
    Yes vs no 2.60 (1.32, 5.08) 0.020
  Restaurant plan for answering questions from food allergic customers
    Yes vs no 2.43 (1.16, 5.12) 0.050
  Experience in this restaurant
    ≥2 vs <2 yr 1.89 (1.01, 3.52) 0.093
a

Overall models were created using a forward selection criterion of P < 0.10. Variables are presented in order of steps at which they entered the model. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. OR > 1 indicates that the odds of the outcome (attitude score in top 50%) were greater for the first mentioned category (e.g., 1 to 10) than for the second mentioned category (e.g., 0).

b

χ2 = 52.00, df = 7, P < 0.001, N = 248.

c

χ2 = 27.86, df = 4, P < 0.001, N = 196.

d

χ2 = 24.43, df = 4, P < 0.001, N = 149.