Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2017 Mar-Apr;38(2):223–235. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000376

Table 2.

Results of an rmANOVA evaluating the effects of age group (child, adult), masker (two-talker speech, speech-shaped noise), and listening condition (no-plug/co-loc, no-plug/msk-side, simUHL/co-loc, simUHL/msk-ipsi, simUHL/msk-contra) on SRTs.

Source F df p partial η2
Age Group 43.04 1, 21 <.001** .672
Masker 581.81 1, 21 <.001** .965
Listening Condition 224.22 4, 84 <.001** .914
Masker x Age Group 26.03 1, 21 <.001** .553
Listening Condition x Age Group 1.82 4, 84 .134 .080
Masker x Listening Condition 69.54 4, 84 <.001** .768
Masker x Listening Condition x Age Group 6.00 4, 84 <.001** .222
*

p < .05

**

p < .001