Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;8:95. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00095

Table 2.

CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets responding to peptides 3 and 6.

In vitro proliferative responses (stimulation index)a
Immunizing Ag (200 μg/mouse) Cell populations (2 × 105 cells) Medium (cpm) Peptide3 (100 μg/ml) Peptide6 (100 μg/ml) MOG35–55 (100 μg/ml)
Peptide 3 Unseparated 2,387 18.0 ± 4.6 0.0 ± 0.5 −1.0 ± 0.2
CD4+ 1,911 24.0 ± 6.0 0.0 ± 0.3 −1.0 ± 0.1
CD8+ 1,764 −1.0 ± 0.0 −0.1 ± 0.0 −1.0 ± 0.3
Peptide 6 Unseparated 2,005 0.0 ± 0.4 9.0 ± 0.8 −1.0 ± 0.2
CD4+ 1,793 0.0 ± 0.4 22.0 ± 3.2 −1.0 ± 0.1
CD8+ 1,862 0.0 ± 1.9 0.0 ± 0.3 2.0 ± 0.5

Apoe−/− mice were immunized with P3 or P6 as described in Table 1. Ten days later, draining lymph node cells from both groups were isolated. The cells were passed through anti-CD4 microbead MAC columns and anti-CD8 columns from Miltenyi Biotech to positively isolate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, respectively. Purified cells, together with unseparated cells were assayed for T cell proliferative responses. All cultures were established in triplicates, and the results were expressed as the mean number of counts per minute ± SEM.

aSIs are calculated by the following formula: counts per minutes (CPM) experimentalcounts per minute (CPM) medium backgroundcounts per minute (CPM) medium background.

Bold font indicates the important data.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure