Table 6.
OLS model for total remuneration
| Explanatory variables | Coefficient (SE) | |
|---|---|---|
| Full model | Reduced model | |
| Years in position | −0.01 (0.01) | |
| Kasai Occidental (vs Equateur) | −0.37 (0.19)* | −0.27 (0.17) |
| Kasai Orientale (vs Equateur) | −0.11 (0.30) | −0.07 (0.28) |
| Maniema (vs Equateur) | −1.27 (0.26)*** | −1.26 (0.18)*** (p < 0.001) |
| Province Orientale (vs Equateur) | −0.74 (0.24)*** | −0.47 (0.22)** (p = 0.032) |
| Population served | 0.00 (0.00) | |
| Total personnel | −0.01 (0.08) | |
| Urban (vs rural) | 0.22 (0.26) | |
| Number of services | 0.06 (0.04) | |
| Distance of facility from village | 0.01 (0.02) | |
| Reference heath centre (vs heath centre) | −0.26 (0.21) | |
| Age | 0.01 (0.01) | |
| Male (vs female) | 0.26 (0.13)** | 0.21 (0.12)* |
| Number of dependents | −0.01 (0.02) | |
| Married (vs not married) | −0.03 (0.04) | |
| University (vs school education) | 0.11 (0.12) | |
| Supported by ASSP programme | −0.13 (0.18) | |
| Receives salary | 0.73 (0.14)*** | 0.79 (0.12)*** (p < 0.001) |
| Receives occupational risk allowance | 0.81 (0.15)*** | 0.70 (0.12)*** p < 0.001 |
| Receives performance payment | 0.59 (0.18)*** | 0.77 (0.15)*** p < 0.001 |
| Receives user fees | 0.65 (0.20)*** | 0.75 (0.17)*** p < 0.001 |
| Receives informal payments | 0.01 (0.17) | |
| Receives income from private clinical work | −0.01 (0.25) | |
| Receives supplemental income | 1.03 (0.13)*** | 1.00 (0.10)*** p < 0.001 |
| Receives per diems | 0.20 (0.13) | 0.20 (0.11)* |
| Constant | 2.45 (0.42)*** | 2.91 (0.22)*** |
| R 2 | 0.48*** | 0.44*** |
| Number observations (n) | 268 | 328 |
*p ≤ 0.1; **p ≤ 0.05; ***p ≤ 0.01