Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2017 Feb 13;542(7642):475–478. doi: 10.1038/nature21355

Extended Data Figure 3. Characterization of m6A modification and gene expression change in the early embryonic transcriptome of zebrafish.

Extended Data Figure 3

a, Venn diagrams show the overlap of two replicates of m6A-modified transcripts determined by m6A-seq and m6A-CLIP-seq at five time points. b, Distribution of m6A-sites (number of m6A-seq peaks) in the six gene groups over time. c, Number of m6A-modified genes identified in both m6A-seq and m6A-CLIP-seq at five time points. d, Quantification of the m6A/(G+A+C+U) ratio of mRNAs purified from zebrafish embryos at various developmental time points by LC-MS/MS. The fluctuation observed may reflect the complex dynamics of the decay of the methylated maternal transcripts, the transcription and methylation of newly synthesized zygotic mRNAs, and their subsequent decay during early development. All time points were normalized to 0 h.p.f. value. Error bars, mean ±s.d., n = 3 (technical replicates). e, Consensus motif identified by HOMER with m6A-CLIP peaks at five time points. f, Metagene profiles depict the subtranscript distribution pattern of m6A-sites (from m6A-seq) within the zebrafish transcriptome. m6A-seq peak signals are enriched after the start codon and before the stop codon. g–h, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of non-methylated maternal transcripts (g) and methylated ones (h). i, Table showing the number of genes downregulated and upregulated in maternal ythdf2−/− mutants at 4 h.p.f. within the 6 gene expression clusters (top 20%).