Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;16:27. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0503-0

Table 2.

Results of GLM model

Vildagliptin Glibenclamide Treatment effect Time effect Interaction
HBA1C (%)
 Baseline 7.7 (7.4–7.9) 7.7 (7.5–8.1) p = 0.85 p < 0.001 p = 0.17
 4 months 6.8 (6.4–7.3) 6.8 (6.4–7.3)
 12 months 7.0 (6.5–7.3) 7.1 (6.5–7.5)
FPG (mg/dl)
 Baseline 155 ± 36 150 ± 30 p = 0.80 p < 0.001 p = 0.64
 4 months 130 ± 36 129 ± 28
 12 months 129 ± 28 129 ± 30
BMI (kg/m2)
 Baseline 29 (27–33) 29 (25–34) p = 0.80 p = 0.67 p = 0.79
 4 months 29 (26–33) 28 (26–33)
 12 months 24 (26–33) 29 (26–34)
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)
 Baseline 96.1 ± 11.8 96.0 ± 14.5 p = 0.24 p = 0.039 p = 0.55
 4 months 95.8 ± 10.5 92.3 ± 14.7
 12 months 95.8 ± 12.0 92.5 ± 12.9
EPC (n/106 events)
 Baseline 39.0 (24.0–58.2) 37.5 (25–59.8) p = 0.025 p = 0.008 p = 0.58
 4 months 37.0 (27.0–65.0) 36.0 (23.0–54.2)
 12 months 45.0 (29.7–67) 32.0 (22.2–53.5)
Circulating markers
 SDF-1α (pg/ml)
  Baseline 2877 (2388–3713) 3134 (2763–4117) p < 0.001 p = 0.38 p = 0.035
  4 months 2293 (1585–3187) 3100 (2572–3782)
  12 months 2064 (1540–2954) 3336 (2778–3863)
 BNP (pg/ml)
  Baseline 3 (1–9) 3 (2–7) p = 0.41 p = 0.045 p = 0.71
  4 months 3 (1–8) 3 (1–5)
  12 months 5 (3–12) 6 (3–10)
 IL-6 (pg/ml)
  Baseline 4.7 (3.0–7.6) 6.1 (4.2–9.2) p = 0.93 p = 0.77 p = 0.15
  4 months 5.8 (3.7–9.7) 5.4 (3.5–8.2)
  12 months 5.0 (2.7–9.9) 5.4 (3.7–6.7)
 CRP (mg/l)
  Baseline 4.0 (3.2–5.7) 3.8 (2.6–6.3) p = 0.43 p = 0.51 p = 0.79
  4 months 4.0 (2.7–5.5) 3.2 (2.4–6.3)
  12 months 3.6 (2.3–6.1) 3.5 (2.9–3.9)
 TNFα (pg/ml)
  Baseline 1.4 (0.7–2.0) 1.6 (1.1–2.4) p = 0.24 p = 0.25 p = 0.97
  4 months 1.1 (0.5–1.8) 1.7 (1.3–2.4)
  12 months 1.1 (0.4–1.8) 1.4 (0.8–2.2)
 GLP-1 total (pM)
  Baseline 84.0 (66.2–109.0) 86.7 (73.7–97.0) p = 0.75 p = 0.83 p = 0.91
  4 months
  12 months 83.4 (68.8–107.0) 88.5 (75.5–114.6)

Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation or median (IQR)

Clinical variables, circulating markers and p values of GLM models (treatment, time and time × treatment effects)

GLM model for primary (EPC) and secondary (SDF-1α) endpoint was performed with adjustment for baseline levels

Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in italics