Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 24;59(2):217–224. doi: 10.1002/dev.21484

Table 3.

Regression models of cortisol stress responses (cortisol stress reactivity and total stress cortisol concentrations ‐ AUC) and maternal parenting stress on behavioral functioning at school

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
B β B β B β B β
Externalizing behavior
Step 1
AUC <0.01 0.02 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.06
Reactivity −0.05 −0.12 −0.05 −0.11 −0.07 −0.14
Step 2
Parenting stress <0.01 0.07 <0.01 0.04
Step 3
AUC × parenting stress <−0.01 −0.16
Reactivity × parenting stress <0.01 0.01
R 2 change 0.01 0.01 0.02
R 2 model 0.01 0.02 0.04
Internalizing behavior
Step 1
AUC <−0.01 −0.03 <−0.01 −0.04 <−0.01 −0.01
Reactivity −0.07 −0.17 −0.06 −0.15 −0.08 −0.19
Step 2
Parenting stress <0.01 0.18+ <0.01 0.17+
Step 3
AUC × parenting stress <−0.01 −0.06
Reactivity × parenting stress <0.01 0.14
R 2 change 0.03 0.03+ 0.01
R 2 model 0.03 0.07+ 0.08
Prosocial behavior
Step 1
Child gender −2.23 −0.19* −2.39 −0.20* −2.08 −0.18+ −1.97 −0.17+
Step 2
AUC 0.01 0.19+ 0.01 0.20+ 0.01 0.17
Reactivity −0.96 −0.16 −1.04 −0.17 −0.97 −0.16
Step 3
Parenting stress −0.02 −0.19* −0.02 −0.18+
Step 4
AUC × parenting stress <0.01 0.08
Reactivity × parenting stress <0.01 0.01
R 2 change 0.04* 0.03 0.04* 0.01
R 2 model 0.04* 0.06+ 0.10* 0.11+

AUC, cortisol area under the curve (total stress cortisol); Reactivity, cortisol stress reactivity. No outliers were removed because Cook's distances indicated no potentially influential data points.

 + p < .100, *p < .050.