Table 3.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | β | B | β | B | β | B | β | |
Externalizing behavior | ||||||||
Step 1 | ||||||||
AUC | <0.01 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 | ||
Reactivity | −0.05 | −0.12 | −0.05 | −0.11 | −0.07 | −0.14 | ||
Step 2 | ||||||||
Parenting stress | <0.01 | 0.07 | <0.01 | 0.04 | ||||
Step 3 | ||||||||
AUC × parenting stress | <−0.01 | −0.16 | ||||||
Reactivity × parenting stress | <0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||
R 2 change | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |||||
R 2 model | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |||||
Internalizing behavior | ||||||||
Step 1 | ||||||||
AUC | <−0.01 | −0.03 | <−0.01 | −0.04 | <−0.01 | −0.01 | ||
Reactivity | −0.07 | −0.17 | −0.06 | −0.15 | −0.08 | −0.19 | ||
Step 2 | ||||||||
Parenting stress | <0.01 | 0.18+ | <0.01 | 0.17+ | ||||
Step 3 | ||||||||
AUC × parenting stress | <−0.01 | −0.06 | ||||||
Reactivity × parenting stress | <0.01 | 0.14 | ||||||
R 2 change | 0.03 | 0.03+ | 0.01 | |||||
R 2 model | 0.03 | 0.07+ | 0.08 | |||||
Prosocial behavior | ||||||||
Step 1 | ||||||||
Child gender | −2.23 | −0.19* | −2.39 | −0.20* | −2.08 | −0.18+ | −1.97 | −0.17+ |
Step 2 | ||||||||
AUC | 0.01 | 0.19+ | 0.01 | 0.20+ | 0.01 | 0.17 | ||
Reactivity | −0.96 | −0.16 | −1.04 | −0.17 | −0.97 | −0.16 | ||
Step 3 | ||||||||
Parenting stress | −0.02 | −0.19* | −0.02 | −0.18+ | ||||
Step 4 | ||||||||
AUC × parenting stress | <0.01 | 0.08 | ||||||
Reactivity × parenting stress | <0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||
R 2 change | 0.04* | 0.03 | 0.04* | 0.01 | ||||
R 2 model | 0.04* | 0.06+ | 0.10* | 0.11+ |
AUC, cortisol area under the curve (total stress cortisol); Reactivity, cortisol stress reactivity. No outliers were removed because Cook's distances indicated no potentially influential data points.
+ p < .100, *p < .050.