Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;17(2):300–313. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12551

Table 1.

Sample details and the sequencing scheme used for each sample

Sample ID % Unique mapped reads to Camelus dromedarius mt genome mt genome length (bp) %mt genome recovered Average read depth GenBank accession no.
MYbaits capture MYbaits‐TD capture Shotgun
AP2 0.123 0.0008 9943 59.7 2.45 KU605058
AP3 0.294 0.175 15 315 92.0 10.63 KU605059
AQ5 0.013 4083 24.5 2.75 KU605067
AQ24 0.011 0.004 5516 33.1 3.56 KU605060
AQ30 0.241 0.088 15 843 95.1 47.10 KU605061
AQ34 0.058 0 12 162 73.0 8.87 KU605062
AQ40 0.346 0.0003 12 422 74.6 19.33 KU605063
AQ46 0.006 0 4143 24.8 1.44 KU605064
AQ48 0.002 0 3829 23.0 1.56 KU605065
AQ49 0.001 0 2850 17.1 1.62 KU605066
Palm152 0.005 0.001 5149 30.9 1.27 KU605068
Palm157* 0.010 10 890 65.4 2.26 KU605069
Palm171* 0.011 7402 44.4 1.82 KU605070
SAG2 0.028 0.046 14 514 87.2 8.48 KU605071
Tel622 0.0001 0.0006 0.0005
Tel623 0.0002 0.0009
Also1 0.0003 0.0008
Also10 0.0007 0.0008

All the libraries were built using the double‐stranded library (DSL) method and subjected to sequencing both pre‐ and postcapture using MYbaits. The samples with an asterisk were only sequenced postcapture. The percentage and average coverage of the unique reads mapped to the dromedary mitochondrial genome and the total length of the recovered mtDNA for each sample are shown. For the wild samples, the length of the genome is not calculated, as a result of low numbers of reads mapped to the reference genome.