Table 1.

Summary of HADDOCK Prediction and Scoring Performance in CASP‐CAPRI

Target name	Oligomeric statea	HADDOCK server prediction	HADDOCK scoring prediction
T68§	Homo‐dimer	0	0
T69	Homo‐dimer	10	4/3**
T70	Homo‐tetramer	8/7**	8/6**
T71	Homo‐tetramer	4	2
T72	Homo‐dimer	1	2
T73	Homo‐tetramer	0	0
T74§	Homo‐tetramer	0	0
T75	Homo‐dimer	2	4/2**
T77§	Homo‐dimer	0	0
T78§	Homo‐tetramer	0	0
T79	Homo‐dimer	0	2/1**
T80	Homo‐dimer	10	2/2**
T81	Hetero‐dimer	0	2
T82	Homo‐dimer	10/10**	10**
T84	Homo‐dimer	10/10**	7/4**
T85	Homo‐dimer	10/10**	10/6**
T86	Homo‐dimer	0	0
T87	Homo‐dimer	10/10**	7/5**
T88§	Hetero‐dimer	0	0
T89	Hetero‐dimer	10/8**	4/1**
T90	Homo‐dimer	10/10**	5/4**
T91	Homo‐dimer	10/10**	8/6**
T92	Homo‐dimer	6	6/5**
T93	Homo‐dimer	10/10**	3/2**
T94	Homo‐dimer	10	3
#Targets		16/9**	18/14**

The overall performance is reported at the bottom in terms of number of successful targets, that is, the ones having at least one acceptable or better solution. The numbers without stars indicate the number of models of acceptable or better quality; numbers with “**” indicate the number of medium quality models.

For targets labeled with “§,” no single acceptable solution was present in the pool of models provided for scoring. See also Supporting Information Table S1 for details about how the server predictions were made.

^aOligomeric state provided to the CAPRI participants by the time of the challenge. For further information see Lensink et al. (2016).11