Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 23;17(1):56–63. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.6885

Table 3.

The distributions of study parameters according to EAT subgroups

Variables EAT (<5 mm) (n=119) EAT (5–7 mm) (n=70) EAT (>7 mm) (n=63) P*
Age, years 46±8 50±8a 50±9a 0.009
Gender, male 50% 63% 63% 0.094
BMI, kg/m2 30.7±5.0 30.1±3.4 33.7±4.3a,b <0.001
WC, cm 96.7±10.3 100.4±7.9a 110.7±9.0a,b <0.001
Hypertension 82% 84% 87% 0.709
Diabetes mellitus 8% 1% 2% 0.019
Smoking status 22% 15% 24% 0.367
Dyslipidemia 27% 35% 40% 0.160
Family history of CAD 67% 44% 53% 0.081
Glucose, mg/dL 101±19 100±16 99±14 0.818
Creatinine, mg/dL 0.81±0.22 0.84±0.13 0.80±0.10 0.537
Uric acid, mg/dL 4.8±1.4 5.3±1.4 5.7±1.4a <0.001
T. Bilirubin, mg/dL 0.95±0.59 0.80±0.42 0.77±0.32 0.051
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 215±39 219±38 227±41 0.158
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 137±31 140±35 145±35 0.302
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 47±14 47±11 45±9 0.430
Triglycerides, mg/dL 157±81 159±116 184±107 0.211
LDL/HDL ratio 3.09±1.02 3.06±0.84 3.33±0.95 0.211
TK/HDL ratio 4.83±1.36 4.87±1.25 5.22±1.22 0.159
CRP, mg/dL 0.41±0.41 0.47±0.43 0.67±0.57a,b 0.001
CRP, log-transformed -0.53±0.33 -0.46±0.32 -0.27±0.30a,b <0.001
ALT, U/L 26±17 27±19 29±19 0.490
GGT activity, U/L 30±22 29±19 34±16 0.433
Leukocytes, 103/mm3 7.4±2.1 7.3±1.4 7.5±1.7 0.896
Hemoglobin, g/dL 14.0±1.8 14.5±1.3 14.4±1.5 0.157
Platelets, 103/mm3 279±57 278±62 292±66 0.368
CIMT, mm, mean 0.72±0.15 0.85±0.16a 0.95±0.12a,b <0.001
PCP 7% 19% 41% <0.001
Medications
 Acetylsalicylic acid 15% 20% 11% 0.625
 Antilipemic agents 9% 5% 13% 0.135
 Antihypertensive drugs 50% 60% 67% 0.895
 Antidiabetic drugs 6% 3% 2% 0.456

ALT - alanine aminotransferase; BMI - body mass index; CAD - coronary artery disease; CIMT - carotid intima-media thickness; CRP - C-reactive protein; GGT - Gamma-glutamyl transferase; HDL-C - high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL - Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCP - presence of carotid plaque; TK - total cholesterol, waist circumference.

*

Mean values were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey’s HSD test among different EAT groups.

a

When compared with EAT <5 mm, P<0.05.

b

When compared with EAT 5–7 mm, P<0.05