Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;10(2):e003658. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003658

Table 3.

Echocardiographic analysis of AAV treated H-Ras−/− mice.

Parameter WT Sham WT TAC KO Sham KO TAC KO + GFP Sham KO + GFP TAC KO + Akt Sham KO + Akt TAC
n 6 6 5 9 4 3 6 6
DSEP WT (mm) 1.01±0.06 1.25±0.05 0.92±0.04 0.95±0.09* 0.79±0.02 0.93±0.04* 0.94±0.08 1.11±0.03
LVEDD (mm) 3.27±0.08 4.26±0.19 3.35±0.08 4.66±0.18 3.59±0.25 4.78±0.11 3.33±0.12 4.08±0.14
DPW WT (mm) 0.91±0.02 1.01±0.08 1.06±0.09 1.09±0.11 0.96±0.12 0.92±0.13 0.99±0.10 0.99±0.06
SSEP WT (mm) 1.66±0.08 1.64±0.11 1.30±0.12 1.29±0.05 1.35±0.11 1.10±0.05* 1.52±0.10 1.42±0.05
LVESD (mm) 1.72±0.11 2.96±0.29 2.18±0.15 3.86±0.21 2.33±0.20 4.01±0.16* 1.90±0.17 2.90±0.15
SPW WT (mm) 1.29±0.09 1.40±0.10 1.29±0.10 1.02±0.01 1.32±0.19 1.06±0.04 1.37±0.05 1.39±0.07
LVEF 0.85±0.02 0.65±0.07 0.72±0.05 0.40±0.02* 0.72±0.04 0.41±0.06* 0.81±0.04 0.64±0.04§
%FS 47.5±2.6 31.3±4.7 35.1±3.4 17.2±1.4 35.2±3.3 16.1±2.7 43.5±3.1 29.1±2.3
BW (g) 24.9±0.4 29.2±0.6 25.6±0.7 32.5±1.6 27.0±0.7 28.9±0.6 28.5±1.3 30.4±1.4

Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M.

*

p<0.05 versus WT TAC.

p<0.05 versus respective Sham.

p<0.05 versus KO + GFP TAC.

§

p<0.05 versus KO TAC.

DSEP WT (diastolic septum wall thickness), LVEDD (left ventricular end diastolic dimension), DPW WT (diastolic posterior wall thickness), SSEP WT (systolic septum wall thickness), LVESD (left ventricular end systolic dimension), SPW WT (systolic posterior wall thickness, LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), %FS (fractional shortening), BW (body weight).