Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172349

Table 3. Results from runs of STACEY with different data arrangements and different collapseHeight summary values including the Machado locality.

Dataa summary collapseHeight: 1x10-5 summary collapseHeight: 1x10-4 node depths (mut/site)e
retainedb PPc tip arrangementsd retainedb PPc tip arrangementsd mel-mir west-west south-west
all-mt+nuc a 10 0.25 (OR,TR),(AR),(MC),(CN),(JR),(PU),(AG),(CU),(AC,IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 1 0.51 (OR,TR,AR,MC,CN,JR,PU,AG,CU,AC,IT,JT),(mel,mir) 0.000085 0.000062 0.000085
all-mt+nuc b 10 0.23 (OR,TR),(AR),(MC),(CN),(JR),(PU),(AG),(CU),(AC,IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 1 0.52 (OR,TR,AR,MC,CN,JR,PU,AG,CU,AC,IT,JT),(mel,mir) 0.000085 0.000060 0.000085
all-nuc a 8 0.16 (OR,TR),(AR,MC,CN),(JR),(PU),(AG),(CU),(AC,IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 3 0.13 (OR,TR,AR,MC,CN),(JR,PU,AG,CU,AC,IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 0.000227 0.000151 0.000233
all-nuc b 8 0.14 (OR,TR),(AR,MC,CN),(JR),(PU),(AG),(CU),(AC,IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 3 0.14 (OR,TR,AR,MC,CN),(JR,PU,AG,CU,AC,IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 0.000229 0.000159 0.000225
up-mt+nuc a 6 0.51 (OR,TR),(AR),(MC),(CN),(IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 2 0.22 (OR,TR,AR,MC,CN,JT),(IT),(mel),(mir) 0.000117 0.000115 0.000621
up-mt+nuc b 6 0.57 (OR,TR),(AR),(MC),(CN),(IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 2 0.20 (OR,TR,AR,MC,CN,JT),(IT),(mel),(mir) 0.000118 0.000119 0.000614
up-nuc a 7 0.21 (OR),(TR),(AR),(MC),(CN),(IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 4 0.45 (OR,TR),(AR,MC,CN),(IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 0.000304 0.000287 0.000683
up-nuc b 7 0.20 (OR),(TR),(AR),(MC),(CN),(IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 4 0.44 (OR,TR),(AR,MC,CN),(IT),(JT),(mel),(mir) 0.000304 0.000282 0.000683

aall: all localities; up: localities upstream of the Tapajós River only; mt: sequences of mtDNA locus; nuc: sequences of nuclear loci.

bnumber of lineages retained from Cichla pinima sensu lato, excluding other species.

cPP, posterior probability of maximum a posteriori model.

dTip arrangements (those together in parentheses) depict which tips were collapsed into a single taxon for a given collapseHeight. Locality codes follow Table 1.

eFor relevant topological comparisons, the depth of the most recent common ancestor is listed. See text and S1 File for further explanation.