Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Mar;205(3):196–202. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000579

Table 2. Logistic Regression and Cox Regression Analyses Evaluating sleep group as predictors of Likelihood of Recovery and Time until Recovery.

Predictor b Wald OR (95% CI) p ΔR2*
Logistic regression: predicting recovery .097
 Treatment group** -0.49 3.06 0.62 (0.36-1.06) .08
 Short sleepers*** -0.24 0.50 0.79 (0.41-1.52) .48
 Long sleepers*** -0.28 0.68 0.76 (0.39-1.47) .41
 Baseline GAF 0.04 0.02 1.04 (1.01-1.07) .01
 Anticonvulsants 0.05 0.02 1.05 (0.52-2.11) .89
 Atypical Antipsychotics -0.27 0.74 0.76 (0.41-1.41) .39
 Other Mood Stabilizers 0.77 3.92 2.16 (1.01-4.63) .05
Cox regression: predicting time until recovery -.076
 Treatment group** -0.22 1.59 0.80 (0.57-1.13) .21
 Short sleepers*** -0.10 0.25 0.90 (0.60-1.36) .62
 Long sleepers*** -0.12 0.33 0.88 (0.58-1.35) .57
 Baseline GAF 0.01 1.18 1.01 (0.99-1.03) .28
 Anticonvulsants 0.12 0.33 1.13 (0.74-1.73) .57
 Atypical Antipsychotics 0.04 0.04 1.04 (0.71-1.52) .85
 Other Mood Stabilizers 0.36 2.02 1.43 (0.87-2.36) .16

Abbreviations: OR (Odds ratio); CI (Confidence interval)

Notes:

*

For logistic regressions, R2 represents Nagelkerke R2, an estimate of the increment in variance in the probability of recovery accounted for by the predictors tested. For Cox regressions, R2 represents Cox–Snell R2, an estimate of the relative association between survival and the predictors tested.

**

Treatment group: intensive psychotherapy (1) versus collaborative care (0).

***

Sleep group: dummy coded with the normal sleepers group coded as the reference group, so only coefficients relative to the reference group are shown.