Table 4.
Characteristics of Studies of Measurement Properties of Instruments Assessing Outcomes in Adult ICU Survivors
| Author, Year | Sample Size | Maximum Length of Follow-up (months) | Males, n (%) | Age(Mean (SD)) | Population | Illness Severity Measure and Score | Instrument Name | COSMIN Measurement Properties Evaluated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Akerman, 2009 | 49 | 12 | 24(49%) | 62(14) | General ICU | APACHE II 18 mean | 3-Set 4P | Hypothesis testing, Internal consistency, Reliability, Structural Validity |
|
| ||||||||
| Akerman, 2013 | 421 | 2 | 254(60%) | 68 (15) | General ICU | SAPS 56 mean | 3-Set 4P | Hypothesis testing Internal consistency, Reliability, Structural Validity |
|
| ||||||||
| Alison, 2012 | 179 | 6 | 108†(60%) | 57 (16) | NA | APACHE II 19 mean | 6MWT | Hypothesis testing. |
|
| ||||||||
| Bienvenu, 2013 | 60 | 60 | 23(38%) | 51 (12) | ARDS | NA | CAP | Internal Consistency |
| IES-R | Internal Consistency and Criterion Validity | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Capuzzo, 2000 | 172 | 12 | 118(69%) | 69 (11) | General ICU | APACHE II 13 mean | QOL-IT | Internal Consistency,Reliability, Hypothesis testing and Responsiveness |
| QOL-SP | Internal Consistency, Reliability, Hypothesis testing and Responsiveness | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Christie, 2006 | 79 | 28 | 12 (15%) | 43 (13) | ARDS | NA | Telephone Battery | Content Validity, Hypothesis testing |
|
| ||||||||
| Christie, 2006 | 34 | 24 | 17 (50%) | 49 (15) | ARDS | APACHE II 19 mean | Telephone Battery | Reliability |
|
| ||||||||
| Denehy, 2014 | 177 | 3 | 113†(64%) | 60 (NR) | ARDS | APACHE II 19 median | 6MWT | Hypothesis testing. |
|
| ||||||||
| Fernandez, 1996 | 578 | 6 | 400(69%) | 58 (17) | NA | APACHE II 16 mean | QOL-SP | Internal consistency, Reliability, Structural validity, Hypothesis testing, Responsiveness |
|
| ||||||||
| Frick, 2002 | 85 | 6 | NA | 65 (NR) | General ICU | SAPS 22 median | Satisfaction Scale SIP Standardized Telephone Interview | Criterion validity, Hypothesis testing, Criterion validity |
|
| ||||||||
| Heyland, 2000 | 30 | 17 | 16 (53%)† | 62 (14) | Sepsis | APACHE II 22 mean | SF-36 v1 | Internal consistency, Reliability, Hypothesis testing |
|
| ||||||||
| Jones, 1993 | 85 | 12 | 49†(58%) | 31 (NR) | General ICU | APACHE II 12 median | FHS | Hypothesis testing |
|
| ||||||||
| Kaarlola, 2004 | 2709 | 72 | 1788† (66%) | 54 (NR) | General ICU | APACHE II 14 median | EQ-5D | Hypothesis testing |
|
| ||||||||
| Khoudri, 2007 | 179 | 3 | 79(54%) | 38 (17) | General ICU | APACHE II 14 mean | SF-36 v1 | Internal consistency, Reliability |
|
| ||||||||
| Khoudri, 2012 | 179 | 3 | 79(54%) | 38 (17) | General ICU | APACHE II 14 mean | EQ-5D | Reliability, Criterion validity |
|
| ||||||||
| Lipsett, 2000 | 128 | 12 | 95†(74%) | 58 (17) | General ICU | APACHE II 20 mean | MSF-36 | Internal consistency, Reliability, Structural validity, Hypothesis testing |
| SIP | Internal consistency, Reliability, Structural validity | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Skinner, 2013 | 67 | 6 | 40†(60%) | 60 (15) | General ICU | APACHE II 17 median | AQoL | Internal consistency, Hypothesis testing |
| SF-6D | Internal consistency, Hypothesis testing | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Stoll, 1999 | 52 | 13 years* | 26(50%) | 36 (18-50) ‡ | ARDS | APACHE II 22 median | Assessment of Traumatic Memories | Internal consistency, Reliability, Criterion validity |
|
| ||||||||
| Sukantarat, 2007 | 51 | 9 | 22(43%) | 57 (14) | General ICU | APACHE II 14 median | DASS | Internal validity,Criterion validity |
| HADS | Internal validity | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Twigg, 2008 | 56 | 3 | 20(45%) | 56 (NR) | General ICU | APACHE II 16 median | UK-PTSS_14 | Internal consistency, Reliability, Hypothesis testing, Criterion validity |
|
| ||||||||
| Vainiola, 2010 | 3600 | 12 | NA | NA | General ICU | NA | 15D HRQOL | Hypothesis testing, Responsiveness |
NA = Not Available, NR = Not Reported
APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; SAPS, Simplifies Acute Physiology Score
ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome
15D HRQOL, 15D Health-Related Quality of Life; 3-Set 4P, 3-SET 4P Questionnaire; 6MWT, 6-Minute Walk; AQoL, Assessment of Quality of Life; Assessment of traumatic memories, Assessment of traumatic memories from intensive care unit; CAPS, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; DASS, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale; EQ-5D, EuroQol - 5 Dimensions; FHS, Follow-up Health Status Questionnaire; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales; IES-R, Impact of Events Scale – Revised; MSF-36, Modified Medical Outcomes Short Form-36; QOL-IT, Italian Quality of Life Questionnaire; QOL-SP, Spanish Quality of Life Questionnaire; Satisfaction Scale, Satisfaction Scale; SF-36 v1, Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 version 1; SF-6D, Medical Outcomes Short Form-6D; SIP,Sickness Impact Profile; Standardized Telephone, Standardized Telephone Interview; Telephone battery, Cognitive Telephone Battery; UK-PTSS-14, UK- Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome 14-Questions Inventory.
1st interview median 4 years from ICU discharge (first = 0 – last = 10 years) with median difference of 2 years to the second interview
Values calculated based on provided data
Median age and numbers in parentheses are the minimum and maximum age