Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 24;104(3):10. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1430-3

Table 2.

Results of final LMMs with confounding effects on personality traits and spatial recognition

Trait Significant effect Estimate ± SE p
Juveniles (week 6 vs. 7) Activity OF Trial number −0.30 ± 0.15 0.049
Test date +0.34 ± 0.11 0.005
Boldness Trial number +0.53 ± 0.15 <0.001
Activity YM Trial number −0.46 ± 0.18 0.017
Exploration Observer +0.51 ± 0.20 0.016
Spatial recognition None
Adults (week 12 vs. 24) Activity OF Housing condition +0.99 ± 0.22 <0.001
Sex −0.55 ± 0.22 0.021
Trial number −0.47 ± 0.15 0.005
Boldness Sex +0.85 ± 0.21 <0.001
Activity YM None
Exploration None
Spatial recognition None
Before and after maturation (week 6 vs. 12) Activity OF Test Date +0.33 ± 0.12 0.008
Sex −0.38 ± 0.18 0.042
Trial number −0.27 ± 0.12 0.025
Boldness Trial number +0.76 ± 0.13 <0.001
Activity YM Trial number −0.31 ± 0.14 0.032
Exploration None
Spatial recognition None
Before and after sexual contact (week 12 vs. 24) Activity OF None
Boldness Sex +0.69 ± 0.25 0.01
Trial number −0.50 ± 0.21 0.03
Activity YM None
Exploration None
Spatial recognition None

All full models included the individual ID as random factor; sex, trial number and housing condition as fixed factors; body mass, test date and test time as fixed covariates, as well as the interactions sex × test time and sex × body mass

SE standard error, OF Open Field test, YM Y Maze test