Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug 25;15(4):584–593.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.035

Table 2.

Predictors of first biopsy-proven acute rejection based on multivariable Cox regression (A2ALL) and multivariable discrete survival analysis (SRTR)*

A2ALL (n=890) SRTR (n=45,423)

Variable Hazard
Ratio
95%
Confidence
Interval
P-value Hazard
Ratio
95%
Confidence
Interval
P-value
Biologically related LDLT vs. non-biologically
related LDLT and DDLT**
0.57 (0.43, 0.76) <0.001 0.78 (0.66, 0.91) 0.002
Recipient age, per 10 years, for age < 55 0.71 (0.59, 0.84) <0.001 0.76 (0.74, 0.79) <0.001
Recipient age, per 10 years, for age > 55 1.12 (0.77, 1.64) 0.54 0.86 (0.81, 0.92) <0.001
Female vs. Male 1.14 (0.85, 1.52) 0.40 1.19 (1.13, 1.25) <0.001
Race (ref = White) 0.20 <0.001
  Black 1.15 (0.62, 2.15) 0.65 1.26 (1.16, 1.35) <0.001
  Asian 1.91 (1.05, 3.47) 0.03 0.87 (0.77, 0.98) 0.03
  Other races 1.03 (0.57, 1.86) 0.93 0.95 (0.76, 1.19) 0.67
Recipient diagnosis: HCV 2.22 (1.57, 3.16) <0.001 1.11 (1.05, 1.18) <0.001
Recipient diagnosis: Autoimmune hepatitis 1.16 (0.66, 2.06) 0.60 0.99 (0.88, 1.12) 0.87
Recipient diagnosis: PSC 1.08 (0.71, 1.65) 0.72 1.32 (1.20, 1.45) <0.001
Recipient diagnosis: PBC 2.10 (1.31, 3.36) 0.002 1.37 (1.22, 1.53) <0.001
MELD at transplant (per 5 points) - - - 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) 0.17
*

Model included adjustments for induction immunosuppression and immunosuppression at discharge from transplant hospitalization, presented in Supplemental Table 4

**

No significant difference between non-biologically related LDLT and DDLT (p=0.71 in A2ALL, p=0.57 in SRTR).

LDLT = living donor liver transplant, DDLT = deceased donor liver transplant, HCV = hepatitis C virus, PSC = primary sclerosing cholangitis, PBC = primary biliary cirrhosis,, MELD = model for end stage liver disease.