Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 27;7:43597. doi: 10.1038/srep43597

Table 3. Evaluate on AUC values of our method, CENTDIST, CEAS, and CORE_TF on seven ChIP-seq datasets.

        CORE_TF promBG
CORE_TF randBG
CEAS
Our method CENTDIST 200 400 1000 200 400 1000 200 400 1000
[20000, ∞) μ 0.8719 0.8567 0.7155 0.7104 0.6403 0.6687 0.6599 0.6709 0.6108 0.5947 0.5987
σ 0.0246 0.0624 0.0943 0.0748 0.1222 0.1360 0.1210 0.0563 0.0284 0.0281 0.0209
[5000, 20000] μ 0.9174 0.8974 0.8200 0.8155 0.7822 0.8131 0.7932 0.7437 0.7169 0.6667 0.6116
σ 0.0182 0.0503 0.0925 0.0969 0.0879 0.0910 0.0867 0.0644 0.0896 0.1422 0.0876
[5000, ∞) μ 0.8992 0.8800 0.7752 0.7705 0.7214 0.7512 0.7361 0.7125 0.6714 0.6358 0.6061
σ 0.0304 0.0551 0.1018 0.0986 0.1208 0.1275 0.1171 0.0681 0.0866 0.1089 0.0635