Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 10;10(1):56–65. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2015.01690

Table 2.

User-selected AMP and β values in the subjective test (in training phase)

Subject LS Input sound level (dB)
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
1 SO -11.95 -19.66 -26.71a) -33.76 -36.78 -39.46 -41.81 -43.83a) -46.85 -48.29
NO -17.99 -21.34 -25.37b) -30.74 -32.97 -40.47b) -42.70 -50.20 -52.55 -56.58
SIN -8.59 -13.62 -16.31 -21.34 -24.36 -29.40 -30.07 -34.09 -40.81 -48.19
β 3.47 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 3.47 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65
2 SO -23.02 -30.07 -33.76 -37.45 -42.15 -44.83 -47.85 -57.92 -63.29 -66.64
NO -2.89 -12.28 -18.99b) -21.01 -30.07 -31.75b) -38.46b) -46.17 -51.88 -57.92
SIN -8.93 -13.96 -16.64 -21.34 -27.05 -31.07b) -33.76 -41.48 -47.85 -53.89a)
β 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 2.65 3.47 3.47
3 SO -13.40 -27.67 -30.20 -29.10 -36.80 -36.80 -43.40 -43.40 -57.70 -48.00
NO -23.32 -23.32 -34.32b) -34.32 -47.11 -47.11b) -53.51 -60.65 -60.65 -60.65
SIN -10.03 -10.03 -21.03 -21.03 -21.03 -19.80 -38.50 -30.80 -52.80 -52.80
β 3.47 2.65 3.47 2.65 3.47 1.76 3.47 1.76 3.47 3.47
4 SO -15.30 -20.00 -25.03 -33.09 -36.78 -37.79 -42.48 -45.17 -54.68 -54.68
NO -4.90 -11.28 -15.97b) -18.99 -23.69 -29.73b) -33.76b) -35.77 -41.14 -46.51
SIN -2.55 -5.23 -10.94 -15.30 -25.37 -30.07 -35.77 -40.13 -45.17 -47.85
β 2.65 1.76 1.76 1.76 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 2.65 2.65
5 SO -6.30 -15.10 -21.70 -25.00 -28.30 -30.50 -31.90 -38.50 -41.01 -52.09
NO -8.70 -17.50 -20.80b) -24.30 -28.70b) -39.70b) -41.90 -47.40 -49.60 -50.70
SIN 5.68 0.26 -4.21 -11.91b) -17.41 -20.71 -20.71 -31.71 -33.91 -43.81
β 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 1.76 2.65 1.76 2.65
6 SO -13.96 -20.34 -26.38 -27.72 -33.42 -36.44 -40.81 -45.17 -51.54 -54.23
NO -1.88 -9.26 -15.30b) -18.99 -26.38 -29.40 -34.09 -39.80b) -45.00 -60.00
SIN 1.14 -4.90 -9.60b) -15.97 -19.66 -25.70 -30.07 -33.76 -38.46 -44.83
β 3.47 2.65 2.65 2.65 3.47 2.65 2.65 3.47 2.65 2.65
7 SO -0.61 -6.11 -13.81 -21.51 -29.21 -34.71 -36.91 -39.11 -43.51 -42.41
NO -11.00 -18.70 -24.20b) -29.70 -30.80 -34.10b) -36.30b) -37.40 -41.80 -44.00
SIN 9.90 2.20 -1.10 -6.60 -12.10 -15.40 -18.70 -25.30 -33.00 -34.10
β 2.65 3.47 2.65 2.65 2.65 1.76 3.47 2.65 2.65 1.76
8 SO -10.36 -13.66 -20.78 -25.21 -29.15 -29.15 -37.27 -37.27 -40.22 -43.18
NO -13.42 -17.82b) -20.02b) -26.62 -31.02 -34.32b) -39.76b) -41.96 -50.33 -50.33
SIN -7.99 -10.92 -16.37 -21.51 -21.52 -28.66 -35.55 -41.95 -45.15 -50.31
β 3.47 3.47 2.65 3.47 2.65 3.47 3.47 2.65 3.47 2.65
9 SO -10.39 -16.99 -21.39 -24.69 -27.99 -29.09 -31.29 -41.19 -37.76 -37.27
NO -16.21 -23.91 -30.51b) -38.21 -43.71b) -49.21b) -53.61 -59.11 -59.11 -61.31
SIN -7.00 -9.71 -15.86 -19.55 -23.49 -28.90 -35.55 -36.53 -39.98 -43.42
β 3.47 3.47 2.65 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47
10 SO -1.09 -9.89 -20.89 -21.99 -27.49 -28.59 -31.89 -35.19 -40.72 -43.42
NO -8.61 -11.91 -17.41b) -22.91 -26.21 -29.51 -31.71b) -35.01 -37.21 -40.51
SIN 15.15 4.56 -3.80 -6.02 -7.74 -12.17 -19.80 -19.55 -28.90 -30.91
β 3.47 3.47 3.47 3.47 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 3.47 2.65

Repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) revealed significant differences among the three listening situations for all input sound level (ISL), and further post-hoc analysis indicated that, in speech-in-noise conditions, subjects select significantly higher AMP values compared to speech-only and noise-only in all ISL levels except 90 dB where this was the case only in noise-only.

AMP, amplification constant; LS, listening situation; SO, speech-only; NO, noise-only; SIN, speech-in-noise.

a)

Not actually NO, but classified as NO.

b)

Not actually SO, but classified as SO.

a) and b) represent misclassified cases.