Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 12;31(3):255–267. doi: 10.1037/neu0000337

Table 2. Speed and Accuracy in Visuospatial Attention, Visuomotor, and Visuospatial Memory Tasks in Control and PKU Participants.

Domain/task Controls PKU participants Controls vs. PKU
M SD M SD N % z = > 2 % z = > 1 t and p
Note. Percentage of Phenylketonuria (PKU) participants with z score = >2 (expected % 2.3) is also reported. RT = reaction time.
a Tasks where there is a significant difference with controls.
Visuospatial attention
 Simple detection (RT – ms) 316 56.9 332 52.9 31 6.5 16.5 t(1, 59) = −1.1; p = .27
 Detention with distractors
  RT − ms 407 72.2 438 70.6 31 3.2 22.6 t(1, 59) = −1.7; p = .09
  % errors .6 .6 .8 1.1 31 6.5 19.4 t(1, 59) = −.8; p = .45
 Choice RT
  RT − msa 281 31.3 307 42 37 16.2 32.4 t(1, 65) = −2.8; p < .01
  % errors .4 .8 .5 .8 37 8.1 8.1 t(1, 65) = −.4; p = .68
 Feature search
  RT − msa 498 71.7 606 167.6 31 32.3 41.9 t(1, 59) = −3.2; p < .01
  % errors 2 2.3 1.6 2.6 31 6.5 16.1 t(1, 59) = .7; p = .50
 Conjoined search
  RT − msa 841 126.3 1,008 239.7 31 25.8 38.7 t(1, 59) = −3.4; p < .01
  % errors 3.1 4.4 2.4 2.7 31 0 3.2 t(1, 59) = .8; p = .43
Visuomotor coordination
 Pegboard (time – seconds)a 59.2 5.1 65.1 11.7 37 18.9 43.2 t(1, 65) = −2.6; p = .01
 Digit symbol (% errors in 90 s)a 27.1 10.2 37.3 11.3 31 19.4 41.9 t(1, 59) = −3.7; p < .01
Visuospatial memory and learning
 Paired Associate Verbal Learning (% errors) 1.9 1.9 3.1 3.82 31 12.9 16.1 t(1, 59) = −1.5; p = .15
 Delayed matching to sample (% errors) 10.5 8.3 14.1 8.5 37 10.8 29.7 t(1, 65) = −1.7; p = .09