Table 1.
Locusa | dbSNPID | Chr | Positionb | Variation (Substitution) | Stage 1c | Stage 2d | Combined | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1/A2 (A1 AF) | β (SEM) | P Value | I2 | β (SEM) | 1-sided P | β (SEM) | P Value | Prop Var Exp (%) | |||||
PPM1J | rs34611728 | 1 | 113255456 | c.639G>T (L213F) | A/C (0.13) | −0.0103 (0.0013) | 1.2E-14 | 13.2 | −0.0059 (0.0023) | 4.7E-03 | −0.0092 (0.0011) | 3.3E-16 | 0.05 |
EDEM3 | rs78444298 | 1 | 184672098 | c.2236C>T (P746S) | A/G (0.02) | −0.0183 (0.0034) | 5.2E-08 | 15.3 | −0.0225 (0.0055) | 1.8E-05 | −0.0195 (0.0029) | 1.5E-11 | 0.03 |
ACP1 | rs11553746 | 2 | 272203 | c.129C>T (T95l) | T/C (0.35) | −0.0049 (0.0009) | 2.0E-07 | 20.7 | −0.0032 (0.0016) | 2.2E-02 | −0.0045 (0.0008) | 1.0E-08 | 0.02 |
ORC4e | rs2307394 | 2 | 148716428 | c.233A>G (N78S) | C/T (0.32) | −0.0058 (0.0010) | 6.8E-09 | 14.3 | −0.0025 (0.0016) | 6.0E-02 | −0.0049 (0.0009) | 8.4E-09 | 0.03 |
SPEG | rs55760516 | 2 | 220354108 | c.8191A>G (R2731G) | G/A (0.33) | 0.0059 (0.0009) | 4.8E-10 | 0.5 | 0.0054 (0.0016) | 3.7E-04 | 0.0058 (0.0008) | 1.7E-13 | 0.04 |
EYA4 | rs9493627 | 6 | 133789728 | c.829G>A (G223S) | A/G (0.31) | 0.0061 (0.0010) | 2.3E-10 | 0.0 | 0.0049 (0.0016) | 1.4E-03 | 0.0058 (0.0009) | 1.4E-11 | 0.04 |
CYP1A1 | rs2472297 | 15 | 75027880 | intergenic | T/C (0.24) | 0.0057 (0.0010) | 7.0E-08 | 0.0 | 0.0059 (0.0017) | 3.2E-04 | 0.0058 (0.0009) | 3.0E-11 | 0.03 |
ATXN2L | rs8049439 | 16 | 28837515 | intronic | C/T (0.40) | 0.0048 (0.0009) | 1.3E-07 | 7.1 | 0.0045 (0.0016) | 1.8E-03 | 0.0047 (0.0008) | 1.2E-09 | 0.03 |
A1, effect allele; A2, non-effect allele; A1 AF, effect allele frequency; Chr, chromosome; Prop Var Exp, proportion of variance in ln(eGFRcrea) explained.
Loci are named according to the closest gene on the basis of the position of the lead SNP for new loci.
Position is reported in UCSC Genome Browser build hg19.
Sample size for stage 1 analysis: n=111,666.
Sample size for stage 2 analysis: n=48,343.
This variant reached chip-wide significance (P<3.7×10−7) in the stage 1 samples but did not meet validation criteria in stage 2.