Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jan 4;62(4):1480–1500. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa56b7

Table 2.

The dosimetric comparison of OARs between three schemes for three case studies. In each cell, the data are listed in the order of schemes “gold standard” 3D/4D(tracking)/3D with IM.

Simulated lung case Lung patient Pancreas patient
Lung V20(%) 9.6/10.6/13.7 13.3/12.7/18.1
Liver Dmean(Gy) 3.1/2.5/5.5 3.2/3.8/3.5
Spinal cord Dnear-max(Gy) 7.7/8.0/10.0 12.5/11.8/11.0 12.8/13.1/16.3
Esophagus V5(%) 51.2/42.9/59.2 53.0/47.9/49.8
Heart Dmean(Gy) 8.2/9.0/8.4 7.1/5.9/8.7
Small bowel D35(Gy) 8.3/7.8/11.2
Left kidney D50(Gy) 8.2/8.0/8.4
Right kidney D50(Gy) 10.8/10.5/11.1