Table 2.
The dosimetric comparison of OARs between three schemes for three case studies. In each cell, the data are listed in the order of schemes “gold standard” 3D/4D(tracking)/3D with IM.
| Simulated lung case | Lung patient | Pancreas patient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung | V20(%) | 9.6/10.6/13.7 | 13.3/12.7/18.1 | — |
| Liver | Dmean(Gy) | 3.1/2.5/5.5 | — | 3.2/3.8/3.5 |
| Spinal cord | Dnear-max(Gy) | 7.7/8.0/10.0 | 12.5/11.8/11.0 | 12.8/13.1/16.3 |
| Esophagus | V5(%) | 51.2/42.9/59.2 | 53.0/47.9/49.8 | — |
| Heart | Dmean(Gy) | 8.2/9.0/8.4 | 7.1/5.9/8.7 | — |
| Small bowel | D35(Gy) | — | – | 8.3/7.8/11.2 |
| Left kidney | D50(Gy) | — | — | 8.2/8.0/8.4 |
| Right kidney | D50(Gy) | — | — | 10.8/10.5/11.1 |