Table 4.

Comparison of CMT and RNFL thickness of the three types of anisometropia

Type of anisometropia	Variable	Worse eye	Better eye	P-value
Anisomyopia	CMT	231.93±33.36	233.0±24.47	0.79
	RNFL	80.5±13.08	85.87±8.46	0.079
	Superior RNFL	95.27±25.129	101.20±22.94	0.16
	Inferior RNFL	98.87±25.083	108.37±20.54	0.15
	Nasal RNFL	64.10±17.39	65.37±13.23	0.78
	Temporal RNFL	61.03±19.78	59.13±7.812	0.151
Anisoastigmatism	CMT	233±34.36	228±33.41	0.16
	RNFL	89.7±10.77	90.107±8.94	0.90
	Superior RNFL	108±14.97	102.75±20.04	0.18
	Inferior RNFL	110.21±15.88	115.85±13.95	0.2
	Nasal RNFL	71.07±11.94	69.178±13.85	0.8
	Temporal RNFL	68.3±21.3	66.03±13.8	0.20
Anisohypermetropia	CMT	232±45.85	224±27.64	0.09
	RNFL	90.02±12.181	89.97±11.14	0.98
	Superior RNFL	105.74±26.882	109.02±28.81	0.56
	Inferior RNFL	124±17.411	117±14.636	0.011*
	Nasal RNFL	71.81±13.969	70.07±15.256	0.8
	Temporal RNFL	62.57±17.796	61.64±13.449	0.82

Notes:

^*P-value >0.05 significant. Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Abbreviations: CMT, central macular thickness; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer.