. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2015 Nov 14;38(3):331–340. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9527-5

Table 1.

Fit indices comparing the measurement models for self-report (Top) and parent-report (Bottom) ICU

	χ²	df	RMSEA (90 % CI)	CFI	CMIN/DF	GFI
Self-Report ICU
Model 1 (1 factor)	757.920^*	252	0.068 (0.072–0.085)	0.520	3.008	0.810
Model 2 (3-factor)	528.982^*	249	0.058 (0.052–0.065)	0.734	2.124	0.878
Model 3 (3-factor bifactor)	385.331^*	228	0.046 (0.038–0.054)	0.851	1.690	0.910
Model 4 (modified 3-factor)	163.882^*	101	0.044 (0.031–0.055)	0.921	1.623	0.940
Model 5 (modified 3-factor bifactor)	176.047^*	100	0.048 (0.036–0.060)	0.905	1.760	0.938
Model 6 (modified 2-factor with “Unemotional” items clustered)	251. 085^*	136	0.066 (0.056–0.077)	0.815	2.438	0.907
Model 7 (modified 2-factor without “Unemotional” items)	134.713^*	64	0.058 (0.044–0.072)	0.902	2.105	0.939
Model 8 (modified 2-factor without “Unemotional” items, and with 1 pair of correlated errors)	110.832^*	63	0.048 (0.033–0.063)	0.934	1.759	0.950
Parent-Report ICU
Model 1 (1 factor)	1083.890^*	252	0.100 (0.094–0.106)	0.617	4.301	0.732
Model 2 (3-factor)	917.019^*	249	0.096 (0.084–0.096)	0.692	3.683	0.795
Model 3 (3-factor bifactor)	598.448^*	228	0.070 (0.063–0.077)	0.829	2.625	0.868
Model 4 (modified 3-factor)	462.961^*	149	0.080 (0.071–0.088)	0.818	3.107	0.864
Model 5 (modified 3-factor bifactor)	519.947^*	147	0.087 (0.07–0.096)	0.784	3.537	0.862
Model 6 (modified 3-factor with 8 pairs of correlated errors)	303.940^*	141	0.059 (0.050–0.070)	0.906	2.156	0.918

p < 0.001